Language selection

Search


We have archived this page on the web

The information on this page is for reference only. It was accurate at the time of publishing but may no longer reflect the current state at the Canada Border Services Agency. It is not subject to the Government of Canada web standards.

Key information—Standing Committee on Public Accounts: Office of the Auditor General Audit on Respect in the Workplace (January 28, 2021)

CBSA opening remarks

Mr. John Ossowski President, Canada Border Services Agency, before the Standing Committee on Public Accounts for the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) report on Respect in the Workplace on Thursday, (11:00 am to 1:00 pm).

Introduction

Good morning (afternoon) Mr. Chair and members of the public accounts committee. I am joined today by Louise Youdale, the Vice-President of our Human Resources Branch. Je vous remercie de m'avoir invité à participer à la discussion aujourd'hui.

It is my pleasure to appear before you today to share details on the efforts we have taken to effect positive change in the culture of the CBSA.

I would like to thank the Office of the Auditor General for their work on this report. I welcome the findings and recommendations that they have put forward.

Let me be clear, the CBSA has zero tolerance for harassment, discrimination or violence in our organization.

Acknowledge gaps

The Auditor General's report laid bare some of the issues we have at the CBSA in the areas of workplace violence and harassment. When the report was tabled, I openly acknowledged those gaps, including how long it takes for issues to be investigated and resolved.

Over the past few years, we have done a tremendous amount of work to change the culture of our organization, focus on people, and address workplace violence and harassment. We acknowledge that systemic racism, intolerance and discrimination exists, and we are committed to continuing to do the work needed to build a more diverse, inclusive and respectful workplace.

What we have done

Several initiatives have been undertaken to understand and further explore root causes of harassment, and to identify the concrete actions needed to create a healthier workplace culture, to provide protection to employees and to address their concerns.

We created a Centre of Expertise to educate, prevent and manage harassment complaints. It is a "one-stop shop" that any employee can turn to for information, support and guidance in matters related to harassment or any type of conflict in the workplace.

We have also invested in a dedicated team of experts to develop and help implement a comprehensive strategy on culture to get to the root causes behind these unfortunate incidents, and to ensure that we build a healthy and vibrant organizational culture.

We are also focussed on selecting and developing managers who demonstrate people skills: respect for all, empathy, courage and emotional intelligence. Skills in conflict resolution are also important. These all contribute to creating a psychologically healthier workplace.

I also want to confirm that our disclosure process for complaints made to our Senior Officer of Internal Disclosure is confidential. There are many ways for employees to bring their concerns forward. Any issues can be reported to our Senior Officer of Internal Disclosure, or an immediate supervisor. Employees can also take their concerns directly to the Office of the Public Service Integrity Commissioner of Canada.

What's more, if an employee feels targeted because of an incident or issue that they have reported, that employee can make a complaint to the Public Service Integrity Commissioner.

Early success

As I said, I am encouraged that our efforts have shown some positive results. Yes, there is still a lot of work ahead of us, in order to build on recent indicators in the past year. For example, our "average positive response" to all questions on the 2019 Public Service Employee Survey increased by more than four percentage points. We also saw a three percent decrease in the number of cases of harassment reported.

Conclusion

Mr. Chair, the Auditor General's report identified ways to address the challenges we have in regard to respect in the workplace. Rest assured we are acting on the recommendations put forward by putting our people first and reinforcing respect, dignity and fairness.

Je me ferais un plaisir de répondre au question du Comité.

Overarching storyline

The CBSA takes the health and well-being of its employees seriously and recognizes the importance of fostering a workplace culture that is respectful and free of harmful behaviours such as incivility, harassment, discrimination and workplace violence. The CBSA also recognizes improving workplace culture is a significant undertaking requiring concerted action over a number of fronts.

The CBSA also acknowledges that indicators of our workplace health are not yet acceptable and that more needs to be done to ensure employees have a healthy workplace to come to every day, which is why the Agency has undertaken a long-term, multi-faceted effort to improve its workplace culture and the well-being of employees.

The Agency's senior leadership recognized the need for significant action after heeding warning signs such as poor Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) results over a number of years, expressions of employee concern, and often tense union-management relations.

As a result, we launched an Integrity Strategy in 2017. The results of the OAG Audit on Respect in the Workplace, conducted between 2016 and 2018, further informed the Agency's need to take more serious action. The CBSA fully embraced the OAG recommendations, including the need to develop a comprehensive risk-based strategy that would build upon initiatives already under way.

While our work is by no means done, we have made progress. For instance, the Agency has developed and is now implementing its Respectful Workplace Framework – a suite of strategies designed to tackle harassment, discrimination and workplace violence head-on through prevention, improved response and restoration.

The Framework addresses the potential risks, including that not all our leaders and employees possess the competencies consistent with a respectful workplace; our assessment and selection methods do not adequately address those competencies; our processes are not sufficiently proactive at identifying issues for timely resolution; that we are falling short in terms of reinforcing behavioural expectations; and that consequences and rewards for workplace behaviour do not reinforce employee trust. The strategies to address these risks focus on leadership, systemic changes to policies and practices, skills development and, increased monitoring and use of data to track progress and inform further changes required.

A critical element of the Framework is the fact that it is informed by high employee engagement. The Agency gathered data from employees through a "Culture Diagnostique" conducted in 2018 and 2019. This diagnostique drew data from a variety of sources, including a Listening Tour (30 sessions with over 400 employees across the country), culture and character workshops, employee forums, and employee surveys. In addition to providing important input and evidence, this work laid the foundation for a renewed workplace culture based upon trust, shared identity, authentic communication, courage and empathy.

Another critical characteristic of the Framework is that it is flexible and responsive to emerging issues. Recent events have put a spotlight on racism and triggered a grass-roots proposal, by racialized employees, for addressing racism in the Agency. It also gave rise to a proposal to collaborate on anti-racism training by our frontline union. Both of these initiatives are now important elements of today's framework, which will continue to evolve as events unfold and as we learn.

As we proceed with this work, we have been leveraging the National Integrity Centre of Expertise – or NICE. We established NICE in to create a one stop shop for employees to turn to for information, support and guidance. It has brought consistency to how the Agency handles complaints; introduced third-party independent investigators to ensure objectivity; strengthened support to managers and employees; and improved monitoring of complaints at a national level.

The Agency remains focused on performance measurement to ensure tangible progress toward our desired workplace culture, free of harassment, discrimination and violence.

We are keen to hear from employees through the recently launched 2020 Public Service Employee Survey. While the 2019 results demonstrated some improvement over the previous year, with a decrease from 22% to 19% of employees claiming to have been a victim of harassment and a decrease from 14% to 12% of employees reporting that they were subject to discrimination, the Agency expects that lasting improvement may take time to show up in the data.

The CBSA recognizes that bringing lasting change to the Agency's workplace will take persistent and sustained action on the part of the entire organization over a number of years, in a way that engages all employees inclusively. That is why senior leadership is steadfastly committed to ensuring this remains one of the Agency's highest priorities until significant progress is made.

Placemat

CBSA key stats and figures

Audit scope

To determine whether the CBSA and Correctional Service Canada promoted and maintained a respectful workplace, free of harassment, discrimination and violence from to .

Audit findings: Stats

  • 35% of participants had concerns or fears of reprisal
  • 21% of cases—organization did not offer option for informal conflict resolution
  • 32% of time—initial assessment were not done as basis for deciding whether to accept a case for investigation

Actions taken since Audit completion

2018 to 2019 Listening tour: 30 sessions held with 400+ employees across the country.

Centralization of coordination, management and oversight of harassment, discrimination and workplace violence complaints through the creation of the National Integrity Centre of Expertise.

Development and implementation of the Respectful Workplace Framework, founded on 3 pillars:

1. Preventative measures:

  1. Modify assessment to recruit right foundational skills
  2. Reinforce expectations when onboarding (orientation and PMA)
  3. Enhance learning throughout lifecycle (incl. mandatory training)
  4. Promote to supervisory roles only if competence is evident

2. Response mechanisms:

  1. Implement collective responsibility to act "See something, say something"
  2. Consolidation of mechanisms
  3. New service standards
  4. Introduction of tech to enhance support, case management and monitoring

3. Workplace restoration:

  1. ICMS enhancements
  2. Values and Ethics Outreach
  3. Proactive Org Assessments

Harassment and discrimination—at a glance

Harassment complaints from 2019 to 2021
  2019 to 2020 2020 to 2021
Net new 66 35
In progress 47 93 (= 83 active complaints in progress)
Closed (20) 44

2020 to 2021 files by region

  • Pacific: 10
  • Prairie: 9
  • Northern Ontario: 5
  • Southern Ontario: 15
  • Greater Toronto Area: 17
  • Headquaters: 20
  • Quebec: 15
  • Atlantic: 1

Top 5: Nature of perceived harassement

  • Unfair treatment: 17%
  • Humiliation: 12%
  • Bullying: 11%
  • Offensive remark: 10%
  • Discrimination: 8%

Harassement complaint parties

  • Employee versus Employee: 53%
  • Manager versus Employee: 10%
  • Employee versus Manager: 37%
    • 4% = Employee versus Executive

Complaints closed: Final result

2019 to 2020:

  • Founded: 2
  • Unfounded: 18

2020 to 2021:

  • Founded: 7
  • Unfounded: 37

Workplace violence—by the numbers

Agency completion rate for training "Violence prevention in the workplace": 83%

Number of complaints:

  • 2018 to 2019: 37 (founded: 1)
  • 2019 to 2020: 28 (founded: 1)
  • 2020 to 2021: 10 (founded: 1)

Early signs of change: 2019 PSES highlights

2019 PSES highlights: 2018 versus 2019 (%)
  2018 2019 Variance
Overall participation rate 44 50 +6
Overall percentage positive responses 44 50 +6
Number of respondents with no fear of reprisal 35 37 +2
Percentage who feel treated with respect 62 67 +5
Percentage of respondents who faced harassment in previous 12 months 22 19 -3
Percentage of respondents who faced discrimination in previous 12 months 14 12 -2
Average percentage overall positive responses by theme: 2017 versus 2019 (%)
  2017 2019 Variance
Harassment 40 61 +21
Discrimination 48 68 +20

CBSA key stats and demographics at a glance

Employment equity—Demographics

Employee profile (as of )
All employees 14,418 100%
Women 6,875 47.7%
Members of visible minorities 2,289 15.9%
Indigenous Peoples 462 3.2%
Persons with disabilities 510 3.5%
Employee representation from 2019 to 2020 (%)
  2019 2019 to 2020
Women 46.8 47.3
Members of visible minorities 15.1 15.7
Indigenous Peoples 3.3 3.3
Persons with disabilities 3.3 3.5

Mobility—promotions

  • Women: 49.2%
  • Members of visible minorities: 22.2%
  • Indigenous Peoples: 3.5%
  • Persons with disabilities: 2.7%

Based on 374 employees whose substantive group and level changed, thus resulted in a promotion.

Quick facts

  • 1 of 4 employment equity groups meets its workforce availability [Women]
  • 4 of 4 employment equity groups exceed or meet last year's CBSA representation

Employee engagement and training

Courses completion rate:

  • Creating a Respectful Workplace: 88%
  • Values, Ethics and Disclosure of Wrongdoing: 93%
  • Mental Health Awareness: 93%
  • Diversity and Race Relations: 93%

Informal Conflict Management Services information sessions delivered in 2019 to 2020: 80+

Participants in the Positive Space course: 956

Participants in the Kairos Blanket exercise: 112

Character Based Leadership Assessment Completion:

  • Executives: 91%
  • Middle managers: 62%

Number of employees who have joined the grassroots—Visible Minorities Task Force: 300+

Leadership Development Sessions delivered in 2019 to 2020:

  • Number of sessions: 40
  • Participants: 2000+

Recruitment and retention

Number of Border Services Officer applications received per year: 25,000+

BSO attrition:

  • 2015 to 2016: 5.98%
  • 2016 to 2017: 5.58%
  • 2017 to 2018: 5.63%
  • 2018 to 2019: 5.74%
  • 2019 to 2020: 7.09%
    • 2019 to 2020 BSO Departure Rate: The highest in 7 years due to an increase in internal promotions (not departures from the Agency)
    • 173 promotions versus previous 5 year average of 98 per year
Agency attrition: First 7 months (At )
Year Number of employees Departures Rate
2019 to 2020 14,014 302 2.2%
2020 to 2021 14,513 233 1.6%

Questions and answers

Office of the Auditor General findings

1. Why did the CBSA not have "harassment, discrimination, and workplace violence" as a corporate risk?

The CBSA has identified an unhealthy culture as one of its highest risks and priorities. This includes harassment, discrimination and workplace violence which all have their own action plan, including targeted activities intended to build a respectful, diverse, inclusive workplace, free of harassment and discrimination.

2. You've known that the Agency has had a problem with workplace culture and harassment for years. Why has it taken so long to develop a comprehensive strategy to address this?

To be clear, the Agency had initiatives in flight to promote a safe and healthy workplace prior to the Auditor's review. These included a heavy focus on culture, and more specifically, our leaders given the significant role they play in setting the tone.

Our efforts focused on ensuring our leaders were very clear about their accountabilities and performance expectations. We have and continue to invest in improving leaders' knowledge of their impact on others and equip them with the skills necessary to create a healthy workplace.

The OAG report served to reaffirm where continued attention was required and offered recommendations for improving our efforts, which was have incorporated into our Respectful Workplace Framework. We have consolidated and prioritized these activities and initiatives.

Prior to releasing the framework, we engaged our employees to ensure that it reflected their qualitative feedback.

We also included establishing a dedicated culture team and the National Integrity Centre of Expertise (NICE), a listening tour, and the reinforcement of executive accountability through more explicit expectations and performance indicators as part of the Executive Management Program.

Question: So, you just re-packaged the old, insufficient initiatives you had in place?

No, we have enhanced and built on some existing activities, to further support positive workplace culture. Additional efforts included the following:

  • In 2018, we established a dedicated culture team
  • We also launched a Listening Tour that year, to gain insights from employees, including on what is actually at the root of workplace malaise
    • The feedback received from employees allowed us to better diagnose what was needed and to take meaningful action, which began last year. Examples include:
      • reinforcing executive accountability
      • performance indicators for Actively Building a Healthy Culture in our Executive Performance Management Program
      • launching NICE in 2019 to enhance prevention and centralize the management of all harassment complaints
      • consolidating planned strategies and actions under our Respectful Workplace Framework

3. The results show that over 60% of employees who completed the 2019 Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) reported they are getting harassed by their senior management. Do you have a leadership problem?

Internal reporting shows that approximately 50% of harassment complaints are between employees (employee vs. employee), while approximately 40% are filed by an employee against a member of management. A small remainder is related to management versus employee.

The vast majority of our management team at CBSA does an exemplary job supporting their employees and creating healthy workplaces.

When instances of harassment arise, managers are held accountable for their actions – and when warranted, face disciplinary measures, which range up to, and include, termination of employment.

Public Service Employee Survey Results show a downward trend in the number of employees who indicated they experienced harassment from individuals with authority over them.

We still have work to do and we recognize it. Let me be clear, we have no tolerance for harassment and so we have a Leadership Development Strategy which establishes the behavioural expectation for all employees and improves our methodology for the selection and development of leaders.

If pressed on discipline

The CBSA has a discipline measures framework that provides examples of misconduct and outlines the associated disciplinary measures that will be exercised when allegations of misconduct are deemed founded.

In the case of harassment and discrimination, discipline can range from a minimum of a 10-day suspension without pay, up to and including termination.

If you are a leader in our organization, you are held to a higher standard, and disciplinary measures are more severe. For example, failure to address a known incident, even if not involved personally, carries a minimum 20-day suspension without pay.

Statistics

4. How can you say that CBSA has a zero tolerance policy toward harassment when 1 in 5 of your employees said they were harassed last year by someone in the Agency (in other words, employee(s) vs employee(s) / employee(s) vs manager(s) / employee(s) vs executive(s) / manager(s) vs executive(s))?

Any form of harassment, discrimination and workplace violence at the CBSA is unacceptable.

The CBSA's Building a Respectful Workplace Framework focuses on prevention, timely resolution and restoration.

We created NICE to ensure that employees feel safe to come forward and have faith in our ability to take action.

We take allegations very seriously and ensure that corrective measures are applied.

Discipline is always used when warranted, as determined through the Agency's robust investigation process. These measures vary depending on the specifics of a case, but range up to, and include termination of employment.

5. Can you tell us how many employees were disciplined and/or terminated last year for harassment?

In 2019, independent external reviewers determined there were 2 founded complaints where one resulted in an employee being disciplined.

6. Can you tell us how many employees were disciplined and/or terminated for violence in the workplace?

Workplace violence is defined as any action, conduct, threat or gesture of a person towards an employee in their work place that can reasonably be expected to cause harm, injury or illness to that employee, as per the Canada Labour Code and Justice Canada.

Since 2013, thirteen (13) violence in the workplace complaints were deemed founded, which resulted in a 1 day suspension to a 25 day suspension.

It is important to note that the outcome of violence complaints filed accordance with the Canada Labour Code is meant to identify preventative measures. Each individual investigation report will identify recommendations to prevent future occurrences of violence based on the complaint. An example could be training.

7. Does the CBSA have the system in place to prevent harassment and discrimination from occurring in the workplace?

Yes, the system includes several policies and practices that clearly articulate the expected workplace behaviour by all leaders. These resources also include information, tools and training to help employees perform in accordance with these expectations, as well as guidance and support for dealing with harassment, discipline, and violence when they occur.

Finally, when faced with founded cases of harassment, discrimination or workplace violence, the Agency has a disciplinary framework that guides appropriate and consistent consequences.

8. Has the CBSA had to compensate any victims of harassment, discrimination or violence?

Yes. We have done so and will continue to do so in cases where compensation is warranted. Information concerning compensation is protected by a non-disclosure agreement to protect all parties.

9. The new Public Service Employee Survey is underway. Do you expect better results this time around?

We are already seeing positive change in our PSES results.

For example, in 2019, 19% of employees said they were subject to harassment which marks a 3 percentage point decrease from 2018. The number of discrimination cases was also down from 15% in 2018 to 13% in 2019.

In the short term, we may see an increase in employees reporting harassment and/or discrimination as they start to feel more at ease reporting inappropriate behaviours in the workplace.

However, considering we are working in the midst of a pandemic, where employees are experiencing much more mental stress, it is hard to anticipate what the results will look like. Employees are encouraged to reach out for help if they are struggling. We are one team during challenging times and we are taking care of one another.

While it is difficult to predict the influence that the pandemic will have on the annual PSES results, we have gone to great lengths to ensure managers are connecting with employees, monitoring the mental health of the workforce and taking responsibility for a safe, healthy workplace seriously, even if the workplace is currently virtual.

The survey has not yet closed, but I am pleased to say that we have already exceeded last year's departmental participation rate, which is an early indicator that engagement levels have not decreased.

10. Have you received any feedback on how the programs implemented to promote a positive workspace are helping (or not helping) individuals in your Agency?

We conducted a Listening Tour just after the audit. This series of in person and online discussions gave us a chance to hear from a broad range of employees in real time. Much of this feedback was used to develop our Respectful Workplace Framework which is our response to the audit. We also see improvement in the PSES results. Of course, it will take some time to evaluate the trends and see positive results.

11. Can you provide a breakdown of your workforce?

During the third quarter of the 2020 to 2021 fiscal year, the CBSA hires were as follows:

  • 52% of hires were Women
  • 8.4% of hires were Visible Minorities
  • 2.2% of hires were Indigenous Peoples
  • 2.2% of hires were Persons with Disabilities
As of (third quarter)
All employees 14,418 100%
Women 6,875 47.7%
Members of visible minorities 2,289 15.9%
Indigenous Peoples 462 3.2%
Persons with disabilities 510 3.5%
1. Self-ID rate is 59.9% which means missing data for 39.4% of the population.
2. Data only includes Indeterminate, Determinate, and Seasonal employees.
3. The CBSA does not have the numbers for intersectionality on hand –in other words, we don't know how many women are also members of visible minorities.

Uniform versus non-uniformed employees:

  • The total CBSA population (excluding students) is approximately 15,500
    Of these 15,500:
    • Approximately 8,100 (52%) are frontline (uniformed) employees
    • Approximately 7,300 (48%) are non-frontline (non-uniformed) employees
  • When students are accounted for, this number rises to approximately 16,100 employees

12. How many cases of COVID-19 have been linked to workplace transmission at the CBSA?

There have been 222 confirmed cases of CBSA employees with COVID-19, 187 of which are now being reported as fully recovered.

Of these 222 cases mentioned, 10 have been identified as potentially linked to the workplace (8 front line and 2 office).

Region Headquarters Atlantic Quebec Northern Ontario GTA Southern Ontario Prairie Pacific
Positive cases 36 1 56 9 45 22 16 37
Recovered cases 29 1 42 9 38 17 16 35
CBSA COVID-19 confirmed cases
Front line staff (BSOs, IEOD, Removals) 171
Office staff 51
Total 222
Of the 222 cases, 10 have been identified as potentially linked to the workplace (8 front line and 2 office).

Employee-Manager-Agency Relations

13. We know that employees have had to go to court to resolve matters related to harassment at the Agency. Do you find it acceptable that employees need to take their employer to court to get a matter resolved?

No, it is clearly preferable to have a regime that can support any employee who wants to bring forward a harassment complaint without resorting to the judicial process.

The Agency has put in place an internal conflict management system for employees to access so that they do not have to take this more onerous step.

The ICMS offers consultation, conflict resolution/effective communication coaching, conflict group intervention, facilitation, and a variety of customized preventative activities. These services can be accessed on a voluntary and confidential basis. To ensure that these services remain available through the pandemic, we have implemented online and teleservice options.

Court proceedings remain an option of last resort.

After a decision is rendered through our formal process, either party can grieve the manner in which the complaint was addressed or the disciplinary measures imposed.

14. Do you know why so many of your employees fear reprisal and have decided not to file any complaints?

1 in 5 of our employees report through the PSES that they were a victim of harassment; 53% of those people further reported that they did not file a complaint due to fear of reprisal.

This means that we have about 1,500 employees who believe it is unsafe to report harassment – which is definitely something that have sought to better understand and have through our Listening Tours.

We have consolidated our efforts under the umbrella of the National Integrity Centre of Expertise to strengthen consistency in how consequences are applied, so that employees have greater confidence and trust in the system and processes.

The National Integrity Centre of Expertise and Informal Conflict Management System are designed to ensure employees feel confident in raising an issue without fear of reprisal. The systems also provides anonymity to witnesses or others dealing with delicate issues.

We have a collective responsibility for addressing instances of workplace harassment and are trying to move a way from a system that puts the whole onus on the victim.

In the Media

15. What is the CBSA doing to ensure that your officers are doing everything necessary to safeguard the lives of Black, Indigenous and People of Colour?

Our Agency is entrusted with protecting Canadians and the rule of law. As President of the CBSA, I have denounced racism and discrimination yet I recognize that it is present in the agency, sometimes clearly perceptible, other times, more conspicuous in our legacy policies and processes.

The Agency has put in place a number of initiatives to ensure that we understand and reflect the perspectives of Black, Indigenous, and other racialized communities, that we start from a point of their lived experience and that we put in place the right corrective measures.

200 employees at all levels from across the Agency have joined forces to form a Visible Minority Task Force. They are developing a grass-roots anti-racism strategy, which is in the early stages of consultation.

We are also working with our colleagues in the Customs and Immigration Union to revisit our anti-racism and de-escalation training for frontline officers.

16. It was reported that the RCMP decided to ban the wearing of the controversial Thin Blue Line emblem among its officers on duty. What is CBSA's policy around the use of this symbol by officers?

The CBSA has also decided to ban the Thin Blue Line emblem among its officers on duty. This was done in collaboration with our bargaining agents and we hope will show the Agency's resolve in combating racism within our workplaces.

17. How can you say you care about the health and wellbeing of employees when you are employing a two-tiered approach to return to work during COVID, in which office staff are able to safely work from home, while frontline workers must risk contracting a deadly disease?

The Agency provides critical, frontline service at ports of entry. Canadians depend on us to provide these services – and, in some cases, we have no option but to offer them in person.

We have implemented a number of preventive measures to ensure the safety of our frontline personnel in the workplace, including the installation of Plexiglas barriers, the promotion of hygiene measures (hand washing, cough/sneeze etiquette, physical distancing), the wearing of personal protective equipment and, when not in their public facing role, the mandatory wearing of non-medical masks.

We are following the advice of Canada's Chief Public Health Officer to ensure that our employees are protected while going to work in the middle of a pandemic. In addition to providing employees with personal protective equipment, they are trained on properly using the equipment to minimize their risk of contracting illness.

18. Border Services Officers are frontline workers. When will they receive the vaccine?

In accordance with federal and provincial health authorities' vaccination plans, BSOs are scheduled to receive the vaccine at the same time as other essential workers across the country.

There are currently no further details available on the rollout of vaccinations for BSOs.

19. What does the CBSA do when employees put up racist or disrespectful comments on their personal social media accounts?

All CBSA employees are subject to our Code of Conduct, which outlines expected behaviours on and off duty.

The CBSA values of Respect, Integrity and Professionalism guide employees throughout their work day and can also extend to private time.

This is especially true in terms of engaging in outside activities on social media fora, outside employment, and political activities. While these are usually private, they become work-related the moment they have negative consequences on the Agency.

Employees who are found to have breached the Code of Conduct will be subject to discipline. Such allegations are fully investigated and respect the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, prior to rendering discipline.

20. Does the CBSA proactively ensure, by checking social media, that its staff are not members of right wing, extremist, and/or white supremacy groups?

The Agency is currently working with other government departments, like the Public Service Commission and the RCMP, to explore and develop procedures for assessing whether new applicants display attitudes that do not align with our value of Integrity.

As part of this work, we are also exploring potential steps to monitor social media activity for racist or discriminatory sentiments while also protecting employee privacy rights.

21. Do you acknowledge that you have systemic racism at the CBSA?

We acknowledge that systemic racism, intolerance and discrimination exists, and we are committed to continuing to do the work needed to build a more diverse, inclusive and respectful workplace. Recent events have made this painfully clear, and have deepened our resolve to foster respect and stop racism within our workplace.

In the Government of Canada's "Building a Foundation for Change: Canada's Anti-Racism Strategy 2019 to 2022", federal institutions are called to take a leading role in addressing systemic racism and discrimination when found to exist in our organizations, policies, programs and services.

Furthermore, the Clerk of the Privy Council recently released a "Call to Action on Anti-Racism, Equity, and Inclusion", which sets common expectations for leaders across the Public Service to take practical actions that will be the basis for systemic change. We are focused at combatting racism at the CBSA.

We are working closely with our anti-racism grassroots task force, union partners and employees across the Agency to help us do precisely that.

22. You don't have an independent review body, so what mechanisms exist for employees to bring issues forward, especially if management is the problem?

The Minister of Public Safety's 2021 Supplementary Mandate Letter outlines the intent to introduce and bring into force legislation to create a review body for the CBSA, including measures to ensure that complaints and reports are responded to promptly. While the Government has introduced legislation in the past which supported the implementation of a CBSA review body, the bills did not receive Royal Assent.

The NICE, which was launched in , offers a neutral and safe place to discuss disrespectful behaviours. Both employees and managers can go to NICE for information about the management, resolution and reporting of harassment.

Further, we have also provided access to Seniors Officer for Internal Disclosure (SOID), who can provide CBSA employees with a confidential means to report wrongdoing, outside of the chain of command. SOIDs are neutral third parties, who are also generally able to assist employees with their issue or determine if the matter should be referred to a more appropriate alternate recourse mechanism.

23. How are CBSA employees trained on anti-cultural bias and respect in the workplace?

CBSA offers various training courses related to topics like anti-cultural bias, diversity and inclusion, respect in the workplace and well-being.

CBSA has four mandatory training courses for all employees which are:

Training course title Completion rate (as of )
Diversity and Race Relations 93.4%
Values, Ethics and Disclosure of Wrongdoing at CBSA 93.8%
Mental Health Awareness 93.7%

Note: the Violence Prevention in the Workplace and the Creating a Respectful Workplace courses have been replaced by one new Canada School of Public Service course (as of ): Harassment and Violence Prevention for Employees, following the implementation of Bill C-65. Statistics on the completion rate of this fourth mandatory course will only be available in February 2021.

Furthermore, the CBSA delivers a training course to all FBs in management positions called Leading at the Frontline. This training includes and covers topics related to respect in the workplace, labour relations, professional integrity, and wellness, amongst many other important topics. We also have some character based leadership content related to courage, humility and authentic conversations. Here are the stats from the Q2 report:

Training completed for Leading at the Frontline [As of by group/level]
(includes pilot, and equivalencies for those that completed Supervisor Essentials/Manager Essentials and the Prairie Region sessions)
Group and level Training completed % completed Remain to be trained
FB-5 535 78.4% 147
FB-6 56 76.7% 17
FB-7 90 84.9% 16
Total 681 79.1% 180

Note: many course offerings have been put on hold due to the pandemic. As such, this is the most recent data available.

We have several other non-mandatory training courses that cover these important topics. Examples of such courses include:

  • 956 participations in the Positive Space at the CBSA course (stats as of )
    • The Positive Space course is designed to help break down barriers and create an inclusive, respectful and welcoming work environment in which everyone can contribute fully regardless of gender identity, gender expression or sexual orientation.
  • 112 participations in the Kairos Blanket Exercise. This includes 32 individuals who participated in a Train the Trainer program. This course is now part of the Induction training for our recruits (stats as of )
    • The KAIROS Blanket Exercise is a facilitated integrative educational workshop that explores the history of Canada and the nation-to-nation relationship between its Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples. A debrief circle follows the blanket exercise activity.

With that being said, we're happy to mention that we have also committed to work collaboratively with the union on the development of our Anti-racism training and our Crisis intervention/de-escalation training.

Page details

Date modified: