Issue notes: Standing Committee on Public Accounts—Report 1, ArriveCAN (May 14, 2024)
Excerpt from CBSA Code of Conduct on Conflict of Interest
Refer to the CBSA Code of Conduct: Chapter 2 - Conflict of Interest
Steps taken to revalidate Conflict of Interest declarations
The CBSA is taking steps to re-validate the Conflict of Interest declarations of its employees and further strengthen controls to ensure any dual employment arrangements do not generate a conflict of interest.
- The CBSA is working to implement a process through which all employees will re-validate their Conflict of Interest attestation forms in fiscal year 2024 to 2025. A recurring process will then be put in place through which the accuracy of the information in every employee's Conflict of Interest form will be re-validating annually
- With respect to procurement practices specifically, the CBSA is implementing a process through which all employees involved in procurement activities - whether that be as the Technical Authority, a bid evaluator, or any other associated role – will be required to certify that they do not have any conflicts of interest related to every procurement to which they are involved
- Externally, a process is being put in place that will require that all vendors with active IT services contracts certify that none of the resources that they provide to the CBSA are active public servants
CBSA Assessment and Revenue Management (CARM) Project
Timeline
- : OAG report identifying issues with CBSA revenue collection system
- : $371 million allocated to develop CARM
- : Contract awarded, competitively, to Deloitte for CARM Phase 1
- : CARM Phase 1 (ARL) released
- : Contract awarded, competitively, to Deloitte for CARM Phase 2
- : CARM Phase 2 R0 deployed
- : CARM Phase 2 R1 deployed
- : Legislative amendments for CARM Phase 2 R2 receive royal assent via 2022 BIA
- : Proposed regulatory amendments for CARM Phase 2 R2 published in CG1
- : OAG report identifying need to replace aging IT systems
- : Proposed regulatory amendments for CARM Phase 2 R2 published in CG2
- : CARM Phase 2 R2 deployed for internal CBSA use
Costs
- Project Approval/Expenditure Authority to develop the CARM ( to ): $526.8 million
- Expenditures to develop CARM ( to ): $438.4 million
- Professional and Special Services: $271.6 million
- Deloitte: $226.2 million
- Authority for maintenance for CARM ( to ): $179.5 million
- Expenditures for maintenance for CARM ( to ): $118.4 million
Contracts
- Since , 114 contracts have been entered into specifically for the development of CARM
- Deloitte is the primary contractor for the development of CARM, accounting for 83% of professional and special services development expenditures
R2 Delays
- to : Cascade effect from R0 delays; necessity to align w/ CRA deployment windows
- to : Legislative amendments not ready, insufficient onboarding
- to : Industry concerns around busiest season, insufficient onboarding
- to : Labour Disruption
ArriveCAN costs
ArriveCAN related forecast and actuals | Forecast | Actual |
---|---|---|
ArriveCAN 1.0 (Initial version) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
70+ Releases of the app and website Development and support of 3 versions of the app: one for iPhones, one for Androids and a website for users without smartphones - over a period of 2.5 years to meet changing public health rules. |
8.8 | 8.5 |
Service Canada call centre Calls and emails from travellers on the COVID health measures in general and the app answered on behalf of PHAC and CBSA. |
7.5 | 6.1 |
Data management For PHAC and CBSA to collect data, report, monitor and ensure compliance with COVID border measures. |
5.2 | 7.9 |
Indirect costs Payments to SSC and PSPC for internal project-related activities and for employee benefits, accommodations, and payments to SSC. |
4.9 | 7.8 |
Proof of vaccination credential development To authenticate and verify, in real time, using the industry standard "Smart Health Card," the traveller's proof of vaccination delivered by provinces and territories, as well as international ones. |
4.6 | 4.9 |
Data storage and cloud services 18 million downloads, 60 million travellers over 2.5 years. |
4.6 | 6.4 |
IT support Technical call center support for airlines, airports and travellers for the app. |
4.5 | 5.4 |
Other CBSA systems To integrate ArriveCAN information into other CBSA systems that were built, modified and maintained to support the border health measures with real time linkages to core border administrative systems. |
4.5 | 4.4 |
Security To ensure it meets Government of Canada standards on cyber security. |
2.3 | 2.4 |
Accessibility To make the application and website accessible for users with disabilities. |
1.7 | 2.3 |
Program and project management PHAC and CBSA program, policy and project coordination and legal services. |
1.6 | 0.9 |
Future readiness Government decision to ensure readiness to restore the public health functionality of the app in the event it requires it following the removal of public health code in . |
- | 2.4 |
Data migration Data transfer to PHAC, and automation of data deletion to adhere to the requirements of the federal Privacy Act and Privacy Regulations. |
- | 1.7 |
Contingency | 3.8 | -Tablenote 1 |
Total | 54 | 55 |
Changes to IT systems related to health measures (Unrelated to ArriveCAN) | Forecast | Actual |
Changes to core CBSA IT systems to manage health measures, such as random testing and contact tracing as prescribed by Orders in Council. | - | 6.8 |
ArriveCAN vendor costs
Vendor | Spent for ArriveCAN ($) |
---|---|
49 Solutions | 455,665 |
Adirondack Information Mgmt | 382,358 |
Advanced Chippewa Technologies Inc | 416,335 |
Altair Electronics | 4,658 |
Amazon Web Services Inc. | 7,975,971 |
BDO Canada LLP | 1,792,254 |
BIR Consulting Inc | 62,775 |
Bluink Ltd | 100,776 |
CDW Canada Corporation | 18,903 |
Dalian Enterprises and Coradix Technology Consulting, in Joint Venture | 4,837,653 |
Donna Cona Inc. | 450,364 |
Emerion | 494,771 |
Ernst & Young LLP | 121,755 |
Experis/Veritaaq | 407,433 |
GC Strategies Incorporated | 13,486,644 |
Google Cloud | 75,606 |
Guardsquare Canada Ltd. | 183,092 |
Ibiska telecom Inc | 217,511 |
Le Groupe Conseil Bronson | 322,871 |
Makwa Resourcing Inc. | 485,015 |
MapleSoft Group | 48,902 |
MGIS Inc. | 675,858 |
Microsoft Canada Inc. | 1,313,232 |
Modis Canada Inc. | 343,124 |
Nisha Technologies Inc. | 100,292 |
Nova Networks | 5,640 |
Pure Spirit Solutions Inc. | 1,008 |
S.I. Systems | 175,039 |
Sada Systems Canada, Inc. | 378,848 |
SoftSim Technologies Inc. | 28,371 |
TekSystems Canada Corp. | 2,773,385 |
TPG Technology Consulting Ltd | 47,778 |
Total | 38,183,887 |
Contract grid: Dalian-Coradix-GC Strategies
Contract | Purpose | Date | Company | Vehicle | Initial value ($) | Amended value ($) | Expenditures ($) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017001080 | Programmer support for a Primary Inspection Kiosk (PIK) application. | 2016-09-09 | 104774 : Coradix Technology Consulting Ltd | Competitive – open bidding | 460,497 | 920,995 | 920,995 |
47419-206529-001-EL | Business and systems analysis, mobile and web development, mobile and web testing, problem management and release coordination for ArriveCAN | 2019-10-07 | 172813 : Dalian Enterprises Inc. | Competitive - Selective Tendering (PSPC) | 4,510,484 | 23,443,480 | 23,443,480 |
47419-226879-004-EL | Informatics Professional Services for Traveller's Program Information Technology Projects | 2020-10-05 | 199235 : Coradix Technology Consulting Ltd | TBIPS Omnibus | 9,189,998 | 9,650,315 | 9,650,315 |
47419-226879-005-EL | Informatics Professional Services for Traveller's Program Information Technology Projects | 2020-09-14 | 104774 : Coradix Technology Consulting Ltd | TBIPS Omnibus | 9,650,315 | 9,650,315 | 9,650,315 |
47419-202719-001-EL | IT Professional Services to develop mobile solutions (not ArriveCAN) to address health and safety risks for front-line BSOs | 2020-06-29 | 198085 : GC Strategies Inc. | Sole sourced through PSPC | 4,433,250 | 11,144,450 | 11,144,450 |
47419-212524-001-EL | IT Professional Services for the development of three versions and 70 revisions to ArriveCAN, Proof of Vaccination, Accessibility and Cyber Security. | 2020-04-08 | 198085 : GC Strategies Inc. | Sole sourced through PSPC | 2,350,000 | 13,936,800 | 13,936,800 |
47419-215022-001-EL | IT Professional Services for ArriveCAN (specific to accessibility) and other projects including NextGen Handheld, Mobile Border and the CBSA's low value shipment application. | 2020-12-18 | 198085 : GC Strategies Inc. | Sole sourced through PSPC | 2,892,800 | 5,904,284 | 5,904,284 |
47419-211699/002/ZG | Informatics Professional Services resources to work on projects related to the Canadian Export Reporting System (CERS); Postal Modernization; X-Ray Analysis; E-Commerce; Cargo Preclearance; Secure Corridor Concept (SCC) Pilot; Guns and Gangs; and Opioids. | 2021-12-20 | 104774 : Coradix Technology Consulting Ltd | contract against Standing offer | 4,100,544 | 4,100,544 | 4,100,544 |
47060-197627-004-ZL | IM/IT resources to perform various tasks in ArriveCAN, including business and systems analysis, mobile and web development, mobile and web testing. | 2021-07-13 | 198037 : Dalian Enterprises Inc. | Competitive - Selective Tendering (PSPC) | 5,850,000 | 13,500,000 | 13,500,000 |
CW2233973 | IT professional resource services to support changes to the operational environment to better respond to public safety needs given the threat of Covid19 and its variants | 2022-05-16 | 198085 : GC Strategies Inc. | Competitive - Selective Tendering (PSPC) | 25,377,165 | 25,377,165 | 25,377,165 |
47419-206529-002-EL | IT resources for Business Analysis, Mobile and Web development for ArriveCAN | 2019-08-26 | 172813 : Dalian Enterprises Inc. | Competitive - Selective Tendering (PSPC) | 496,386 | 3,497,265 | 3,497,265 |
McKinsey contracts: Summary sheet
Purpose | Business Consulting/Change Management Services contract that resulted in Business Case for CARM |
---|---|
Contract period | Award date: End date: |
$ Value / Spent (dollars) | Contract value: $1.99 million Amount spent: $1.8 million |
Notes | CBSA received a benefits framework to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of adopting digital processes to improve Revenue Management of Duties and Taxes on imported goods. |
Additional information | 1) What advice did the CBSA follow from McKinsey as a result of this contract? 2) Why were external resources required to accomplish this work? |
Purpose | Contract for Executive Transformation Services |
---|---|
Contract period | Award date: End date: |
$ Value / Spent (dollars) | Initial contract value: $791,000 Amended contract value: $1.8 million Amount spent: $1.6 million |
Notes | Executive Transformation Services to maximize the potential benefits of multiple transformation initiatives underway at the CBSA as well as to provide guidance toward the development of a Renew Al Strategy and potential implementation. |
Additional information | 1) What advice did the CBSA follow from McKinsey as a result of this contract? 2) Why were external resources required to accomplish this work? |
Purpose | Contract for value (vendor) management work plan |
---|---|
Contract period | Award date: End date: |
$ Value / Spent (dollars) | Contract value: $1.33 million Amount spent: $978,000 |
Notes | Establishment of a Value Management Office strategy and work plan to support the CARM project. |
Additional information | 1) What advice did the CBSA follow from McKinsey as a result of this contract? Why were external resources required to accomplish this work? |
Purpose | Benchmarking contract that was canceled before any work completed |
---|---|
Contract period | Award date: Initial end date: Amended date: Contract ended with no expenditures |
$ Value / Spent (dollars) | Contract value: $1.98 million Amount spent: $0 |
Notes | Establishment of benchmarking services for the CARM project. This contract was canceled without expenditures after it was determined that the work would be completed with in-house resources. |
Additional information | 1) What advice did the CBSA follow from McKinsey as a result of this contract? 2) Why were external resources required to accomplish this work? |
Botler AI chronology
- : the CBSA entered into a contract with Coradix in joint venture with Dalian designed to explore an approach to increase awareness and access to information regarding workplace misconduct, violence and harassment. Discussions about if/how to pursue this work followed
- : the CBSA requested to the vendor, Coradix in joint venture with Dalian, that the work be suspended until later in the year due to internal constraints
- : Botler email to CBSA regarding contractual matters between Botler/Coradix/Dalian/GC Strategies; seeking payment for work performed; and seeking a renewed contractual arrangement for further work
- : CBSA correspondence exchange with all contractors urging swift resolution of payment issue
- : Botler email to CBSA reiterating contractual concerns raised on 27 September; alleging retaliation by Coradix/GC Strategies; and seeking a discussion on new contracting arrangements with CBSA
- : the vendor was informed and acknowledged that the TA was cancelled, in accordance with the cancellation terms outlined in the contract
- : Botler email to CBSA announcing that they had "uncovered substantial misconduct" and were "now in a position to share our findings from the last 36 months with you and discuss our proposed strategy for the next steps"
- : Botler summary of the work performed on the pilot project, suggesting they had "detected and validated wide-ranging instances of misconduct"; recommending a risk assessment; and suggesting a Government of Canada wide contract for Botler's product
- : Botler sends detailed allegations to CBSA
- : CBSA Professional Integrity Division launches an administrative investigation into the allegations made by Botler
- 13, 21, and : CBSA Professional Integrity Division holds preliminary discussions and shares information with the RCMP
- : CBSA Professional Integrity Division sends formal written referral to the RCMP
McKinsey fact sheets: OPO
OPO Procurement Practice Review of Contracts Awarded to McKinsey & Company
Objective
To present key facts related to the Office of the Procurement Ombud (OPO) Procurement Practice Review of Contracts Awarded to McKinsey & Company completed in .
Key facts
List of CBSA contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company since sampled by OPO:
Purpose of contract | Contract dates | Contract amount (including amendments) | Amount spent | Tendering |
---|---|---|---|---|
Executive Support Services | 2017-10-23 to 2018-10-31 | $1,796,700.00 | $1,590,000.00 | Competitive |
Creation of a Value Management Office | 2018-08-31 to 2020-08-31 | $1,332,000.00 | $977,700.00 | Competitive |
Benchmarking Services | 2022-10-21 to 2022-12-19 | $1,975,270.50 | $0.00 | Non-competitive |
The following table summarizes key facts related to the internal audit report:
Subject | Key facts |
---|---|
Favouritism | OPO found that the procurement strategy was changed for two contracts, including one led by the CBSA, after it was discovered that McKinsey would have been ineligible to bid had the department, issued the solicitation using a procurement vehicle for which McKinsey could bid, creating a strong perception of favoritism. As part of the recommendations of its internal audit of consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company, the CBSA has strengthened its controls over the management of procurement:
|
Search results | For one contract where the procurement was conducted by CBSA, Centralized Professional Services System (CPSS) search results were missing from the file. The consequence of not documenting CPSS search results is that Contracting Authorities cannot demonstrate that invited suppliers were qualified supply arrangement holders at the time of solicitation or that they were appropriately selected in accordance with CPSS rules. In response, the CBSA's procurement team has been issued a revised document checklist to ensure that all documents of business value, such as CPSS search results, are retained appropriately. The new Assurance Program in 2024 to 2025 will ensure the consistent application of the new guidance and the documentation held in the procurement files; the results of the Assurance reviews will be presented to the CBSA's executive committee on a quarterly basis beginning on . |
Bid evaluations | The report indicates that in one contracted awarded by CBSA, records of the evaluation of bids were deficient as documentation regarding individual and consensus bid evaluations were incomplete or absent from the file. In response, the CBSA's procurement team has issued a revised document checklist to ensure that all documents of business value, such as bid evaluations, are retained appropriately. The new Assurance Program in 2024 to 2025 will ensure the consistent application of the new guidance and the documentation held in the procurement files; the results of the Assurance reviews will be presented to the CBSA's executive committee on a quarterly basis beginning on . |
Contract Security Program | The report indicates that of the 6 competitive contracts with security clauses, one contract awarded by the CBSA did not have a record (in other words, email) showing that the contract with a PSPC security clause had been provided to PSPC's Contract Security Program (CSP). In response, the CBSA's new Procurement Directorate has prepared and communicated guidance to help ensure that each step is completed throughout the procurement process, including the need to share contract information with the Contract Security Program. |
Contract amendment | OPO found that an amendment to a CBSA contract was not on file and it could not be confirmed that work under the amendment was consistent with the scope of the original contract. On , PSPC suspended the CBSA's authority to issue its own TAs on currently active professional services contracts for which PSPC is the contracting authority. The CBSA has established a Procurement Review Committee which, together with the Contract review committee, will be responsible for approving all contracts and task authorizations above $40,000 at every stage of the procurement process. This new governance structure will serve to strengthen oversight and ensure sound stewardship of public funds. Additionally, the Agency has issued a revised document checklist to our procurement team to ensure that all documents of business value, including amendments and task authorizations, are retained appropriately. Procurement training products have also been refreshed to address gaps related to documentation. |
Status of implementation of audit recommendations | The review recommended the following: CBSA and ISED should implement procedural controls to ensure procurement strategies are centered on satisfying operational requirements rather than engaging specific suppliers. The management action plan was completed at the time of the review's publication. As part of the recommendations of its internal audit of consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company, the CBSA has strengthened its controls over the management of procurement:
|
CBSA Internal audit of federal government consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company
Objective
To present key facts related to the CBSA Internal audit of federal government consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company published on .
Key facts
List of CBSA contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company since :
Ref. # | Purpose of contract | Contract dates | Contract amount (including amendments) | Amount spent | Tendering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Business Consulting Services | 2016-05-02 to 2016-10-30 | $1,999,998.30 | $1,769,910.00 | Competitive |
2 | Executive Support Services | 2017-10-23 to 2018-10-31 | $1,796,700.00 | $1,590,000.00 | Competitive |
3 | Creation of a Value Management Office | 2018-08-31 to 2020-08-31 | $1,332,000.00 | $977,700.00 | Competitive |
4 | Benchmarking Services | 2022-10-21 to 2022-12-19 | $1,975,270.50 | $0.00 | Non-competitive |
The following table summarizes key facts related to the internal audit report:
Subject | Key facts |
---|---|
Favouritism | The report indicates in contracts 2 and 4, evidence was found that McKinsey was being considered by CBSA management prior to the issuance of the request for proposal. This raises questions as to the overall fairness and openness of the processes as it could be perceived that McKinsey's bids were favoured by the CBSA. In response, the CBSA has implemented the following controls:
|
Responsiveness to bidders | The report indicates that in contract 3, bidders requested extensions and asked whether experience on a smaller project could be accepted. Both requests were denied by the CBSA, with no clear rationale. When the bidding period closed, only one bidder had submitted a proposal: McKinsey. Providing additional context when responding to bidders would have contributed to improving the transparency of the process. In response, the CBSA has taken the following actions:
|
Bid evaluations | The report indicates that evaluations of the bids and justification for awarding the contracts to McKinsey were not available in the files. In response, the CBSA has taken action to ensure procurement contain all documentation of business value, including bid evaluations. This includes performing quality assurance reviews on a risk-based sample of procurement files to ensure proper retention of necessary documentation. |
Conflict-of-interest declarations | The report states that only 1 of 4 files reviewed contained conflict of interest declarations. In response, the CBSA has taken action to ensure procurement contain all documentation of business value, including conflict-of-interest declarations. This includes performing quality assurance reviews on a risk-based sample of procurement files to ensure proper retention of necessary documentation. |
Security clearances | The audit found that documents were not available to clearly show that all security clearances were obtained prior to work commencing or that individuals responsible for contract oversight monitored and oversaw the performance of the contractor. The internal audit indicated that "we were unable to verify the security clearance status of all McKinsey consultants within the time constraints of this audit." On , as part of the OAG audit, the CBSA provided evidence to the OAG regarding security clearances obtained for all listed consultants for the three contracts sampled (#1-3). |
Status of implementation of audit recommendations | The audit recommended the following: The Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch (FCMB) should establish appropriate controls to oversee the management of procurement by:
The current status of the management action plan is as follows:
|
MRAP for IAPED Audit of procurement and contracting
- Report date:
- Period covered by the audit: to
- Start of the reporting phase:
Overall Management Response
The Finance and Corporate Management Branch (FCMB) thanks the Internal Audit and Evaluation Directorate for this audit and accepts the findings of this audit and has already launched a number of improvement initiatives in context of the other audit exercises that have been ongoing in parallel. The Finance and Corporate Management Branch has developed a management improvement plan to strengthen the various Agency controls including procurement planning and reporting, financial management and compliance mechanisms.
Recommendation 1
The Vice-President of Finance and Corporate Management Branch should strengthen the procurement planning process by:
- Tracking unplanned procurement requests and use this data to determine required procurement capacity
- Assessing Procurement and Contracting Directorate's capacity including developing and communicating services standards to the Agency for each procurement type
- Assessing workplace health and determining the measures required to help improve employee retention
- Modifying and communicating existing guidance to Cost Centre Managers to clarify the level of detail required for planned procurement as part of the Integrated Business Plan exercise
- Reviewing planned procurements with a strategic focus to identify potential efficiencies, provide advice/recommendations and plan for longer-term procurement needs
Management response
Agreed. The Finance and Corporate Management Branch recognizes that a strong procurement planning process ensures both short term and long term value for money. The CBSA's improved governance over procurement will review and approve Branch Procurement Plans, to be included in each Branch Integrated Business Plan.
Management Action Plan | OPI | Completion date |
---|---|---|
1.1 The CBSA 's improved governance over procurement includes a new Procurement Review Committee to review and approve planned contracts and task authorizations. Recognizing the need to ensure sound stewardship of public funds, the new governance structure will provide additional oversight on all contracting activities, focusing on delivering both short term and long term value for money and alignment with procurement and project management policies. The Procurement Review Committee will not only act as challenge body for procurement decisions, but also provide strategic advice to ensure procurement strategies fit the agency's long term needs. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
Completed |
1.2 In addition, the Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch will work to strengthen the procurement planning process by:
|
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
|
1.3 The Procurement and Contracting Directorate has, as part of its Public Service Employee Survey response, put in place outreach initiatives with employees, the formalization of the Employee Engagement Committee, established skip meetings at various levels of the structure, and will continue to monitor as part of the next Public Service Employee Survey to ensure workplace health. The Procurement and Contracting Directorate has drastically reduced its attrition rate, stabilizing the workforce and will utilise its new committee to monitor the situation. A presentation on workplace health will be built using the Public Service Employee Survey and presented to the new Procurement Review Committee. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
Recommendation 2
The Vice-President of Finance and Corporate Management Branch should strengthen the contract management processes by:
- Communicating the expectations for monitoring contracts to all delegated Cost Centre Managers
- Developing a centralized storage solution for all required contract management documentation
- Periodically conducting spot checks to verify that contract management activities are occurring, as well imposing corrective actions where/if required
Management response
Agreed. The Finance and Corporate Management Branch recognizes the need to strengthen contract management processes. The CBSA's procurement function was nationalized in , and regrouped under one organization. This new central organization, the CBSA Procurement and Contracting Directorate, has since launched a comprehensive improvement plan to further strengthen management controls at all levels across the Agency and it has already improved governance across the procurement functions.
Management Action Plan | OPI | Completion date |
---|---|---|
2.1 The Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch launched a comprehensive improvement plan to further strengthen management controls at all levels across the Agency. One of the plan's main points is the CBSA's improved governance over procurement, which includes a new Procurement Review Committee to review and approve contracts, and to provide a reminder that all procurement actions need to go through the Procurement and Contracting Directorate. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
Completed |
2.2 The Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch will update its guidance and establish clear responsibilities for cost centre managers and procurement officers on the use of a centralized storage solution in Apollo for all contract management documentation. The CBSA Procurement and Contracting Directorate will perform assurance reviews to ensure the new requirement is being followed. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
|
2.3 The Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch has updated and communicated a Guide to the Management of Contracting intended for Cost Centre Managers (CCM). The purpose of this guide is to equip CCMs with the knowledge and the tools they need to manage their procurement requirements and contracts. The guide was released to all CBSA employees on , via the CBSA Daily Insider. An annex with a detailed table of roles and responsibilities reminds CCMs to work with CBSA Procurement and Contracting Directorate on all contracts and task authorizations. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
Completed |
2.4 The Vice-President of the Finance and Corporate Management Branch will monitor contract management activities through regular quality assurance reviews to assess the adequacy of documentation and compliance with procurement processes. The results of the Assurance Reviews, and any recommendations for corrective action, will be presented to a governance committee on a quarterly basis starting in . |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
Recommendation 3
The Vice-President of Finance and Corporate Management Branch should strengthen the Agency's efforts to reduce the risk of fraud by developing measures to proactively monitor systems and processes to identify and mitigate potential instances of fraud, including sharing the results of any misconduct or wrong doing investigations or quality assurance activities with all CBSA employees to demonstrate the efforts taken to address unethical behaviours.
Management response
Agreed. The Vice President of Finance and Corporate Management Branch will continue ongoing efforts to reduce the risk of procurement fraud and determine what more can be done to prevent the occurrence of fraud and to mitigate fraud.
Management Action Plan | OPI | Completion date |
---|---|---|
3.1 Enhance the Agency's Fraud Risk Profile, which assesses the Agency's top internal fraud risks (including procurement fraud) by:
|
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
3.2 FCMB to perform quality assurance reviews on a risk-based sample of procurement files. (Completed) |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
|
3.3 Perform a review of CBSA's system based internal controls and accesses for procurement, close any gaps identified, including removing access to procurement and contracting functionalities from individuals who do not require them. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
|
3.4a Develop a procurement process map that clearly identifies accountabilities and responsibilities of executives and mangers in general, technical authorities, project authorities and section 32 and 34 authorities to help ensure everyone understands the requirements of their position vis-à-vis procurement. 3.4b Implement and communicate the procurement process map and establish a repository of signed attestation forms acknowledging accountabilities and responsibilities identified in the document. |
FCMB – Procurement and Contracting Directorate |
|
3.5 Develop a communication strategy to share the results of misconduct investigations with all employees to deter unethical behaviours from reoccurring. Present the strategy to the appropriate governance committee for approval. |
FCMB – Security and Professional Standards |
Recommendation 4
The Vice-President of Finance and Corporate Management Branch should:
- In consultation with Business Process Owners, review the Segregation of Duties Matrix to confirm conflicting roles
- Review the role approval process to ensure that incompatible roles are not granted, and justification is obtained if incompatible roles are required
- Develop procedures to monitor users who have been granted incompatible roles to ensure the access privileges are not being used inappropriately
Management response
Agreed. The Vice-President of the FCMB will, in consultation with other subject matter experts, develop business processes to assign, manage and review the Segregation of Duties (SoD) related to roles management. This will provide reasonable assurance to ensure access privileges are well managed and that mitigation strategies exist for granted exceptions to minimize the risk of fraud. The Agency will also be moving to SAP4/ HANA which will allow a more efficient way to manage system accesses in the long run.
Management Action Plan | OPI | Completion date |
---|---|---|
4.1 Clean-up existing conflicting roles by removing unnecessary access and ensuring only those who require conflicting roles are granted access with appropriate justification maintained on file. |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
4.2 Update the CAS roles catalogue including definitions and clear descriptions of authorized accesses for each role. |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
4.3 Develop and communicate guidance to clarify the BPO's roles and responsibilities related to role approval and regular monitoring of users with incompatible roles. |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
4.4 Review the CBSA SoD Matrix with BPOs to confirm conflicting roles and also identify any additional conflicting roles that may exist for the CBSA environment. Obtain VP FCMB approval of final SoD Matrix. |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
4.5 Based on the revised CBSA SoD Matrix, clean-up additional conflicting roles that may have arisen from the review |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
|
4.6 Develop and communicate a monitoring strategy and process to monitor users who have been granted incompatible roles to ensure the access privileges are not being used inappropriately. |
FCMB – Agency Comptroller |
IAPED Audit of McKinsey contracts
Refer to the Internal audit of federal government consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company
Summary of MRAP actions
Internal Audit of Federal Government Consulting Contracts Awarded to McKinsey & Company
Summary of Recommendations
- a) Ensuring procurement files contain all documentation of business value
- b) Obtaining greater assurance that Section 34 for contracts is appropriately carried out by managers
- c) Increasing management's awareness surrounding contracting rules
- d) Increasing oversight of the use of Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements in a risk-based manner
Summary of CBSA Management Response and Action Plan
- All delegated managers / Cost Centre Managers (CCMs) are required to inform FCMB Procurement of any contracts or call-ups requested directly from PSPC, in order to maintain a central record of all CBSA contracts. (Completed)
- A revised contract documents checklist was distributed to all procurement staff and remind them of the requirements to complete and retain the necessary records (for example, conflict of interest declarations, bid evaluations, etc.). (Completed)
- Available procurement training products (PSPC, CSPS, etc.) were reviewed to assess whether additional training is required for delegated managers through supplemental guidance or training materials. (Completed)
- Quality assurance reviews were performed on a risk-based sample of procurement files to ensure proper retention of necessary documentation to support S41 of the FAA. (Completed)
- Additional guidance was distributed to all delegated managers on their roles and responsibilities regarding S34 authorization to clarify the importance of ensuring deliverables/services have been received prior to the approval of payment release and that all relevant deliverables are retained. (Completed)
- A Quality Assurance (QA) framework was developed related to section 34 delegated authorities, outlining roles and responsibilities and methodology for verifying accounts, to ensure expenditures are made in accordance with delegated authorities' responsibilities and comply with CBSA and Treasury Board policies, guidelines and directives. (Completed)
- Guidance to cost centre managers (CCMs) was provided on the key requirements for initiation and administrating contracts. (Completed)
- All Delegated Managers / CCMs were reminded of the importance of ensuring the Procurement Team is involved in any contracts or call-ups requested directly from PSPC, in order to maintain a central record of all contracts. (Completed)
- The Terms of Reference of the Contract Review Board were reviewed to provide oversight on contracts issued using certain PSPC Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements. (Completed)
- The risk-based methodology was reviewed to assess which contracts will be reviewed by the Contract Review Board (for example, task authorizations or call-ups for professional services and contract amendments greater than a specific threshold)
Outstanding action items:
- FCMB Agency Comptroller (AC) will continue to deliver information sessions to CCMs to provide an overview of the Agency's instrument of delegation of spending and financial authorities. These sessions will be repeated on an annual basis for newly appointed CCMs. (Due Date: Ongoing)
- FCMB will review its Section 34 non-compliance process and request a FIMC decision on whether it should be further strengthened (First error identified results in a written warning to the delegated manager; Second error results in a compliance notice to the VP/RDG; Third error results in the withdrawal of their Delegation combined with a suitable development plan). (Due Date: )
OAG Audit of ArriveCAN
Summary of Recommendations
1. Accurately coding and allocating expenses to projects to ensure proper financial records.
2. Documenting interactions with potential contractors and rationales for non-competitive procurement processes.
3. Having the CBSA's Procurement Directorate review all contracts and task authorizations for compliance with policies.
4. Ensuring that potential bidders are not involved in preparing requests for proposals.
5. Ensuring that contracts and task authorizations specify the required experience and qualifications for resources.
6. Ensuring that tasks and deliverables are clearly defined in contracts and related task authorizations.
7. Ensuring that all resources under contract have valid security clearance on file before starting any work and that prior to payment, supporting evidence is maintained on file to validate the work performed.
8. Carrying out and documenting testing prior to releasing an application or update, as well as obtaining release approval.
Summary of CBSA Management Response and Action Plan
- The CBSA's Procurement function was centralized and regrouped under one organization
- Launched a comprehensive improvement plan to further strengthen management controls at all levels
- Require contractors to clearly identify the relevant financial codes on their invoices by
- Develop and implement procedures to ensure the financial coding is consistently being applied across all areas of the Agency by
- Established a new Contract Review Board to review and approve contracts and task authorizations.
- responsible for approving contracts and task authorizations at each stage, covering procurement strategy, project initiation, and at contract award, which will include assurance that the tasks and deliverables are clearly defined in the contracts. (Completed)
- Implement a requirement for staff to report interactions with potential vendors by
- The Procurement Directorate will act as the single window for interactions with vendors in the context of the procurement process.
- It will also monitor compliance by developing regular risk-based reviews of contracting files
- The new Assurance Program in 2024 to 2025 will ensure the consistent application of the new guidance by reviewing the documentation held in the procurement files
- All headquarters staff with procurement responsibilities have completed four training courses
- Employees with procurement responsibilities will be required to attend a Code of Conduct and Values and Ethics awareness session to ensure a clear understanding of expectations to minimize potential apparent and real conflicts of interest
- A procedure for streamlined testing documentation will be developed and implemented that will increase agility in emergency situations while at the same time ensuring sufficient controls are in place to document testing results prior to release to production
- In addition, the Information, Science and Technology Branch will review and update existing testing procedures to ensure control steps are introduced and documentation is complete before any system or application is released to production
OPO Procurement Practice Review of ArriveCAN
Summary of Recommendations
4. CBSA should establish a quality control process to ensure mandatory criteria are not overly restrictive and do not undermine the fairness and openness of the bid solicitation process.
5. PSPC and CBSA should ensure adequate procedures are in place for sharing contract information with the Contract Security Program. These procedures should be communicated with all procurement personnel and monitored for compliance.
7. CBSA should ensure the qualifications and experience of all resources proposed in response to a TA request are consistently assessed against the requirements for the applicable category and level as set out in the contract and document results of the assessment in the file.
10. CBSA should not authorize any TAs without first confirming resource(s) named in the TA meet(s) all security requirements and retaining the confirmation in the contract file.
13. CBSA should ensure the completeness and accuracy of proactively published contract information as required under the Directive for the Management of Procurement.
Summary of CBSA Management Response and Action Plan
- The Agency has created a new Executive Contract Review Board, which is responsible for ensuring that mandatory criteria are not overly restrictive for all contracts above $40,000
- In addition, contracts above $1 million are approved by the CBSA's Executive Committee to ensure they do not undermine the fairness and openness of the bid solicitation process. (Completed)
- The CBSA's new Procurement Directorate has prepared and communicated guidance (including a checklist) to help ensure that each step is completed, including the need to share contract information with the Contract Security Program. (Completed)
- The CBSA's new Procurement Directorate has prepared and communicated guidance to ensure that each step is complied with, including the need to consistently assess qualifications and experience and document the results of the review are recorded in the contract file. In addition, all managers in headquarters, with procurement responsibilities, were required to undertake mandatory training in 2023. (Completed)
- The CBSA's new Procurement Directorate has prepared and communicated guidance to ensure that each step is complied with, including the need to confirm that resources meet the security requirements and the results of the review are recorded in the contract file. (Completed)
- The consistent application of the new Standard Operating Procedures will be assessed as part of the regular Assurance Reviews. ()
- The CBSA's new Procurement Directorate has performed a review of proactive disclosure to ensure the transparency over external reporting and ensure full compliance with the proactive disclosure requirements. Since mid-2023, monthly data validation takes place to support the completeness and accuracy of proactively published contract information. (Completed)
- To provide further assurance that the CBSA meets its legislative requirements, regarding proactive disclosure, the CBSA will develop new reporting capabilities in the Agency's Financial System to ensure the completeness and accuracy of proactively published contract information. (A)
OPO Procurement Practice Review of Contracts Awarded to McKinsey & Company
Summary of Recommendations
1. CBSA and ISED should implement procedural controls to ensure procurement strategies are centered on satisfying operational requirements rather than engaging specific suppliers.
Summary of CBSA Management Response and Action Plan
The following management action plan has been implemented:
- As part of the recommendations of its internal audit of consulting contracts awarded to McKinsey & Company, the CBSA has strengthened its controls over the management of procurement:
- Increased management awareness of contracting rules and requirements by mandating training, refreshing guidance and ensuring procurement officer involvement in all contracting
- Increased oversight of the use of standing offers and supply arrangements in a risk-based manner
- The CBSA's improved governance over procurement includes a new Procurement Review Committee to review and approve contracts and task authorizations
- The new governance structure provides additional oversight on all contracting activities, focusing on delivering value for money and alignment with procurement and project management policies
- The new Executive Procurement Review Committee and its sub-committee, the Contract Review Committee, are responsible for approving all contracts and task authorizations above $40,000 at each stage of the procurement process, covering the procurement strategy, project initiation, and at contract award, which includes a review of the professional services experience and qualifications requirements
- This new governance structure ensures that procurement strategies are centred on satisfying operational requirements rather than engaging specific suppliers
Internal Audit of Contracting and Procurement
Summary of Recommendations
1. Procurement Planning by ensuring that branches and regions identify all relevant procurement requests in the procurement planning process and the volume of unplanned requests is better understood. Additionally, developing service standards and ensuring that workplace heath and employee retention is addressed will help ensure the Agency's future procurement requirements can continue to be met.
2. Contract Management by reinforcing expectations, verifying expectations and implementing corrective measures if needed.
3. Corporate Culture and Proactive Monitoring by demonstrating the actions management has taken to address behaviour that does not align with CBSA values, and shifting from being reactive to proactive in terms of fraud management.
4. Segregation of Duties by validating the definition of conflicting roles, minimizing the approval of and cleaning up existing incompatible roles and monitoring those whose conflicting access is required for their day-to-day responsibilities.
Summary of CBSA Management Response and Action Plan
- The CBSA's improved governance over procurement will review and approve Branch Procurement Plans, to be included in each Branch Integrated Business Plan. ()
- The Procurement and Contracting Directorate will develop a presentation on workplace health to be built using the Public Service Employee Survey and presented to the new Procurement Review Committee. ()
- The CBSA's Procurement and Contracting Directorate has launched a comprehensive improvement plan to further strengthen management controls at all levels across the Agency and it has already improved governance across the procurement functions. The Directorate has also updated and communicated a Guide to the Management of Contracting intended for Cost Centre Managers (CCM). Future actions include:
- The CBSA will update its guidance and establish clear responsibilities for cost centre managers and procurement officers on the use of a centralized storage solution in Apollo for all contract management documentation. ()
- The CBSA will monitor contract management activities through regular quality assurance reviews to assess the adequacy of documentation and compliance with procurement processes. ()
- The CBSA will continue ongoing efforts to reduce the risk of procurement fraud and determine what more can be done to prevent the occurrence of fraud and to mitigate fraud. ()
- The CBSA will develop business processes to assign, manage and review the Segregation of Duties related to roles management. This will provide reasonable assurance to ensure access privileges are well managed and that mitigation strategies exist for granted exceptions to minimize the risk of fraud. The Agency will also be moving to SAP4/ HANA which will allow a more efficient way to manage system accesses in the long run. ()
Technical explanation: ArriveCAN quarantine error
From to , 10,200 ArriveCAN users out of the approximate 2,000,000 ArriveCAN submissions, despite having submitted all the required information and their proof of vaccination using the ArriveCAN app, received automated quarantine notifications when they should not have when they crossed the Canadian border.
This issue was related to a defect in the iOS version of the application that had incorrectly defaulted a field "quarantine_exempt", to false. This flag is used by the ArriveCAN back-end system to send automated quarantine notifications to travellers.
The defect was introduced in ArriveCAN version 3,0 for iOS and was caused in a very specific scenario, where a user:
- started the "public health" data submission flow
- added the traveler information and their corresponding vaccine information
- exited the "public health" flow
- and then later returned to continue the submission
Essentially, if the user began their submission, stopped and returned later, they would be flagged for quarantine.
When the user resumed the submission, the app used the default value of the "quarantine_exempt" flag, instead of the modified value based on the traveler's data and vaccine information. This defect was not detected during testing because this scenario was not a part of the ArriveCAN test cases.
In response to this defect, the CBSA updated their testing to cover this scenario and invested resources in building an automated testing capability for ArriveCAN so that more time can be dedicated to testing new features where defects such as this could be introduced.
The CBSA resolved this issue in 4 stages:
- On , a resolution was implemented to the vaccination flow for all new submissions. From that point on, newly created submissions were not falsely flagged as going into quarantine
- On , a resolution was applied to correct the ArriveCAN submissions of users who had not yet crossed the border so t they hat they would not receive false quarantine notifications when cross the border
- On , a fix was implemented to stop sending false quarantine notifications to travelers who had arrived and were receiving them
- On the the CBSA sent corrected data files reflecting the true quarantine status to PHAC to ensure that PHAC's IT systems used to manage quarantine cases were in synchronization with CBSA's data
Page details
- Date modified: