We have archived this page on the web

The information was accurate at the time of publishing but may no longer reflect the current state at the Canada Border Services Agency. It is not subject to the Government of Canada web standards.

Executive Vice-President's Transition Binder 2019
Human Resources Branch (HRB)

Introduction

In laying out this year’s plan, the Human Resources Branch (HRB) is keeping focus on building a sustainable future – with Renewal and Nationalization leading the way – while building on our accomplishments and successes of the past, and learning from our challenges.

In support of our initiatives, programs, resources, risks and priorities, we will ensure to continue to foster our Agency values of integrity, professionalism, and respect in all that we do.

We believe that, central to the achievement of our initiatives, will be a strong emphasis on workplace wellness and culture. The HRB will aim to continue efforts to enhance the employee experience and empower all employees, regardless of level; to be agents of change so that we can continue to improve; all the while delivering great work for the Agency. The Branch prides itself on progressing as a united national Human Resources function that continuously delivers positive results in support of the Agency.

With the understanding that, by embodying our values we are putting our people first, HRB’s goal is to support a culture of equality and fairness for all. This can only be achieved by working side by side as a united team!

Senior Leadership Team
Human Resource Branch

Key deliverables

2019 to 2020 Branch priorities

Human Resources Branch top 20 deliverables

Responsibilities

The CBSA’s Human Resources Branch is comprised of high-performing individuals who contribute to the Agency’s mandate by serving their clients coast to coast. Our human resources specialists deliver advice, guidance and services within seven main functions: workforce intelligence; organisational design and classification; staffing and recruitment; training and development; building a workplace of choice; restorative practices; and enabling functions.

The Human Resources Programs Directorate (HRP) is responsible for a wide range of HR services and programs within the Agency. Specifically, HRP is responsible for national staffing and recruitment policies and strategies; national staffing services; national outreach and recruitment; employment equity and official languages programs; national organizational design and classification; workforce planning; analysis and performance measurement; HR systems; and awards and recognition.

The Labour Relations and Compensation Directorate (LRCD) provides functional leadership on labour relations, compensation, integrity, and workplace wellness. LRCD is the spokesperson for engaging bargaining agents at the Agency-level and the key advisors in regional discussions. LRCD also provides guidance and support to employees on matters pertaining to their health and wellbeing. The directorate is currently comprised of four areas of expertise: Workplace Wellness, Workplace Issues management, Compensation, National Integrity Centre of Expertise.

The Training and Development Directorate (TDD) provides functional leadership over the CBSA’s formal and informal learning solutions, including setting out national policy and directives, working with program leads to maintain National Training Standards (currently frontline focused), annual confirmation of Agency and federal priorities through the National Training Plan and reporting on mandatory training results. Through the Force Generation program, TDD delivers the Officer Induction Model from recruitment and training (OITP) right to in-field development (OIDP). TDD also stewards the CBSA College network of campuses across the country, centres of expertise and the CBSA OL School widely used by the CBSA, federal partners and international institutions.

The Management Cadre Programs and Services Directorate (MCPS) drives both the national and Executive talent management, performance management, and leadership development strategy programs – impacting every employee, manager, and Executive at CBSA.  The Directorate also leads organizational development, design and change management impacting the Executive cadre; Executive resourcing and succession planning; Executive compensation and benefits areas of expertise; and the planning and predictive analysis of Executive talent management needs.

The Branch Planning and Integration Management Division (BPIM) ensures horizontal management, coordination, and reporting of Agency and/or Branch deliverables through the planning, delivering, and monitoring of CBSA/HR activities. The Division operationally supports the Vice-President through the development, engagement, and communication of strategic files which include, but are not limited to Performance Management Agreements, Audits and Evaluations, Branch Governance, and Branch Finances.

Risk/Issues/Challenges

Issues at a glance

Compensation backlog

Description

Timeliness to process compensation transactions remains a pressure point for the Agency.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Obligations under Bill C-65 and Safe workspaces report

Description

The Agency must take actions to address the new legislated obligation to better support employees facing harassment.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Outdated HR systems / IT infrastructure

Description

Ensure that modern HR Systems are in place to enable Human Resources employees and managers to deliver on the Agency’s mandate.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Alignment between talent availability and location

Description

Ensuring that the right people are in the right place with the right skills.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Recruitment

Description

The Agency must identify recruitment and retention strategies that will enable HR employees and managers to deliver its mandate.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Strategic workforce planning

Description

Managers may not develop workforce strategies that are responsive to emerging business priorities to allow HRB’s delivery of efficient and effective advice/solutions to attract, train/develop, and retain employees.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Leadership

Description

Managers at various levels of the organization may not effectively lead as required to achieve the Agency’s macro-level transformation agenda.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Employee Wellness

Description

Employee morale and workplace satisfaction continues to be a prominent issue amongst CBSA employees.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Force Generation

Description

Alignment of upcoming Force Generation with upcoming workforce commitments.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Functionalization/Nationalization

Description

The implementation of the Functional Management Model organizational design has pronounced effects on the Branch, with the need to develop new business processes while also having to continue day-to-day activities.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Management of CBSA/Bargaining Agent Relationship

Description

Already strained relationships between the CBSA and bargaining agents may continue to deteriorate.

What we are doing about it

Headwinds

Hot files

5A Public Service Employee Survey

Background

As you all know, the Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) provides insight into federal public service (PS) employees' engagement and into their opinions about their leadership, the workforce, their workplace, workplace well -being, and compensation. The PSES was conducted every 3 years from 1999 until 2017. In 2018, the survey became an annual survey, launched from to .

CBSA 2018 PSES - Highlights

Participation

Image description

The number of CBSA responses is 6377.

The infographic shows the Agency’s 2018 PSES response rate percentage:

CBSA vs similar OGDs

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Image description

The average positive response rate across the Public Service is 62.55%. For CBSA and similar departments it is as follows: CSC 49.75%, CBSA 52.06%, Public Safety 58.88%, GAC 59.08%, RCMP civilian employees 65.18%, and IRCC 65.24%.

Source Data:

Figure #: 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate of similar OGDs compared to CBSA
OGD (by percentage) Average Positive Response Rate
Public Service 62.55
CSC 49.75
CBSA 52.06
Public Safety 58.88
GAC 59.08
RCMP 65.18
IRCC 65.24

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Note: RCMP results are based on civilian population only.

Most improved

Source: 2017 and 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Image description

The PSES questions with the greatest improvement between the 2017 and 2018 PSE Surveys were:

Source Data:

Figure #: PSES questions with the greatest result improvement between the 2017 PSES and the 2018 PSES
PSES Questions (by percentage) 2017 PSES 2018 PSES Percentage point increase
Getting the required training 44 56 +12
Support towards Work-Life balance 57 61 +4
Know how my work contributes to the achievement of my department's or agency's goals 65 71 +6

Source: 2017 and 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

CBSA average positive response rate

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Image description

The 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Organization, Branch and Region is as follows: Public Service 62.5%, PO, CTO, CARM and SPB 62.3%, HRB 61.4%, FCMB 57.5%, HQ 55.4%, ISTB 53.5%, PRG 52.5%, Ops (HQ) 52.6%, CBSA 52%, and Regions 50.0%.

Note: PO, CTO, CARM and SPB are summed together since they have a low population.

Source Data:

Figure #: 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Organization, Branch and Region
Organization, Branch and Region (by percentage) Average Positive Response Rate
Public Service 62.5
PO, CTO, CARM and SPB 62.3
HRB 61.4
FCMB 57.5
HQ 55.4
ISTB 53.5
PRG 52.5
OPS (HQ) 52.6
CBSA 52.0
Regions 50.0

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Note: PO, CTO, CARM and SPB are summed together since they have a low population.

Requires attention

Image description

CBSA’s response rate has dropped by 6.5% from last year. This decrease in responses could be attributed to a combination of different factors; namely due to survey fatigue, survey launch during peak period within the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as well as the fact that front-line staff may have a more difficult time accessing technology to complete such a lengthy survey.

CBSA results were 2nd lowest across the PS (but substantially ahead of Correctional Service of Canada, by an average of 2.3 percentage points per question). The CBSA was last or next-to-last in every PSES. Direct comparison to other law enforcement agencies/departments is difficult as "font-line staff" is usually excluded from the PSES survey (i.e. Department of National Defence military, Royal Canadian Mounted Police - police).

It appears that CBSA actions to address its poor showing in the 2017 PSES may be having an impact on the overall results for the organization in 2018. Employees are feeling more confident with the training they receive, work-life balance as well as their role at the CBSA. Although there is still much to do in order to maintain this trend, communication remains a key aspect to link the work employees are doing in regards to the CBSA's objectives.

The 5 top areas requiring improvement at the CBSA are not easily improved as there is a link with the type of work (front-line law enforcement) and the culture at the Agency: We require greater awareness and tools to deal with the following issues: Harassment (7% above PS average). Discrimination (6% above PS average),Conflict Resolution (4% decline in employees knowing where to get help in resolving conflict, from 2017), Performance Issues (3% decline in managers properly addressing performance issues) and Pressure relating to a heavy workload (3% increase since 2017).

For the numbers on harassment and discrimination, yes we are doing worse than the Public Service in 2018. That being said, 2017 question asked about discrimination in last 24 months while the 2018 question asked about discrimination based on lost 12 months- not quite a comparable.


Quick facts

Image description

Employment equity and diversity

Image description
  1. Women: 3.5% points more positive than male counterparts
  2. Visible Minorities: 2.8% points more positive than non Visible Minorities
  3. Persons with Disabilities: 12.96% points less positive than persons without disabilities
  4. Aboriginal Persons: 5.8% points less positive on all questions than non Aboriginal Persons
  5. Gender Diverse: 18.3% points less positive than women & 14.8% points less positive than men

Employee engagement

Source: 2017 and 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Image description

The PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Employee Engagement Questions is as follows:

Source Data:

Figure #: 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Employee Engagement Questions
PSES Employee Engagement Questions (by percentage) 2018 CBSA PSES 2017 CBSA PSES 2018 Public Service PSES 2017 Public Service PSES
I am proud of the work I do. 81 80 85 87
Overall, I like my job. 72 70 80 80
Overall, I feel valued at work. 49 46 66 65
I am satisfied with my department or Agency. 44 42 68 68
I would recommend my department or Agency as a great place to work. 43 41 67 66

Source: 2017 and 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Overview of themes

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Image description

The 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Occupational Group within PSES themes are as follows:

Source Data:

Figure #: 2018 PSES Average Positive Response Rate by Occupational Group within PSES Themes
PSES Themes (by percentage) EX FB Administrative Groups (AS & CR) Professional Groups Other
Compensation 51 41 46 34 34
Employee Engagement 79 53 64 66 63
Leadership 76 40 60 58 57
Workforce 79 48 61 63 59
Workplace 64 43 56 54 51
Workplace Well-Being 64 56 66 61 62

Source: 2018 Public Service Employee Survey Results, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Highlights

Image description

Employee engagement and pride in its organization has a large impact on CBSA culture and is quite important to an employee's sense of well-being and belonging. Studies show that the level of engagement of Senior Leaders will have a cascading effect down to middle managers and employees.

There is a strong correlation between the quality of supervision on overall job satisfaction; when employers care about the wellbeing of their employees, this in turn will result in employees caring about the business.

Employees that feel a sense of purpose will also display sentiments of well-being. PSES results show that CBSA employees are very proud of the work that they do (81%),and have an overall feeling of well-being at work (67%). While these are relatively positive responses, of note that only 43% would recommend the Agency as a great place to work.

Students are the happiest group at CBSA (73.72%). This positive result is likely due to the launch of the Student Experience Office as well as various engagement activities and student community forums.

Respondents identifying as Gender Diverse, were the least positive of the groups within Employee Equity Diversity and Inclusion (18.3% less positive than women and 14.8% less positive than men).

Studying the 6 themes (compensation, employee engagement, leadership, workforce, workplace and workplace well-being),it is not surprising that the average response for Compensation is the lowest of all. Of note however, that CBSA has performed better than the PS average by 4.8% due to the proximity of our compensation advisors.

The FB Group has the lowest average score for 5 of the 6 categories, while the EX group is very happy at CBSA with the highest score for 5 out of 6 categories.

5B Deputy Minister University Champion

Deputy Minister University Champion Initiative

Synopsis:

The purpose of this document is to describe the support and role of the Canada Border Services Agency’s (CBSA) Human Resources Branch in supporting the Deputy Minister in his or her Deputy Minister University Champion (DMUC) role.

Background:

The DMUC Initiative is aimed at strengthening linkages between the Government of Canada and Canadian universities and to support robust and relevant public administration education and research so that the Federal Public Service has access to leading ideas and theories, a new generation of public administration scholars and new employees who are well-educated in modern public management.

Deputy Ministers have flexibility in terms of how they exercise their role in strengthening the linkages between the public service and universities. Some best practices are outlined below:

CBSA’s Human Resources Branch Strategic Workforce Management Division is responsible to provide support, advice, and coordination between the Agency and assigned universities for all DMUC initiatives.

Context & analysis

Since 2017, efforts have been focused on establishing relationships with the University of Victoria (UVic) and Royal Roads University (RRU) due to President Ossowski’s DMUC role with these two institutions. We have also established a partnership with Trent University, due to former CBSA Executive Vice-President Namiesniowski’s DMUC role with this institution.

The recent appointment of Deputy Namiesniowski to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has resulted in the Trent University Champion role moving to PHAC, but because the DMUC Initiative is a “whole of government” initiative, the CBSA will continue working with Trent and PHAC on initiatives currently underway.

Given the need for public service renewal, the CBSA is working in partnership with UVic, RRU and Trent faculty, students and career services functions for the purpose of recruiting post-secondary students and graduates for careers in the public service and the CBSA.

More particularly, the CBSA is engaged in the following activities:

Key next steps

If the incoming Deputy Head has not been assigned a university to champion, the Canada School of Public Service will facilitate this partnership.  Once assigned, the Agency’s Strategic Workforce Management Division will work with the Deputy Head to determine priorities, roles, responsibilities, and timeframes.

If the incoming Deputy Head is currently assigned a university, the Deputy Head will continue supporting that institution. In this case, the Strategic Workforce Management Division will liaise with the Deputy Head and the Deputy’s former department to facilitate the transition of work to the Canada Border Services Agency.

5C Force Generation

Synopsis:

The Force Generation Program is the process by which the Agency resources the personnel needed to carry out its mandate. It ensures the availability of a fully-trained, skilled and cohesive border services workforce, and that Canada’s front-line is staffed to address operational requirements, with the knowledge and skills to respond to current and future border needs.

Background:

Force Generation responds to Agency business requirements to deliver a baseline number of recruits annually to address front-line attrition rates and changes in front-line workforce demand. The Canada Border Services Agency’s (CBSA) front-line provides integrated border services that support national security and public safety priorities and facilitate the free flow of persons and goods, including animals and plants, which meet all requirements under the program legislation. Databases and tracking mechanisms to manage the program and its outputs are in place.

Context & analysis

Force Generation collects and analyzes key activities related to our current front-line officers including outreach, recruitment, training and development to ensure a sustainable front-line workforce of the future in order to support national security and public safety priorities and facilitate the free flow of persons and goods.

The Force Generation Program is grouped into three key areas:

The Force Generation Program accomplishes its mandates through various activities:

Resources (human, financial and technological) used to carry out the Force Generation Program focus on the recruitment, outreach, and management of officer trainees at the front end as the CBSA recruits are seen as the primary feeder group for all other front-line positions within the CBSA continuing the development and delivery of training to support all front-line positions as employees move beyond the FB-03 Border Services Officer function.

Key next steps

The CBSA has been working to stabilize baseline funding for the annual training of 300 new officers trainees in order to accommodate for the expected attrition rates within the front-line job community. In addition, seeking additional funding to meet this ongoing attrition and to fulfill the officer needs for various new projects and initiatives put forth from the Federal Government of Canada.

The Force Generation Program continues to evolve finding efficiencies to improve the program, including implementing recommendations from the Officer Induction Model Management Response Action Plan undertaken by Audit and Evaluation.

Building on the Border of the Future 2030 Strategic Vision, the CBSA is exploring how we train and equip our existing and future workforce to ensure they have the right skills to operate in a dynamic and challenging border of the future environment and create a resilient culture that can adapt to and harness technologically-advanced processes and capabilities by developing a Border of the Future officer profile and competencies.

Prepared by:

Keren Hawkins
Acting Vice-president
Human Resources Branch


Demographic report

CAS Source Date

Includes:
Active and inactive employees / based upon employees' substantive group and level and substantive cost centre
indeterminate, determinate, student, seasonal and casual employees

Employee tenure (by region)
Employee tenure Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
Indeterminate 657 1,881 590 4,404 2,064 1,557 1,108 1,772 0 14,033 87.7%
Determinate 2 35 3 180 24 14 7 45 0 310 1.9%
Casual 13 57 10 309 37 0 43 39 0 508 3.2%
Student 28 210 25 198 333 9 109 217 0 1,129 7.1%
Seasonal 12 0 5 1 0 0 2 2 0 22 0.1%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
% of population 4.4% 13.6% 4.0% 31.8% 15.4% 9.9% 7.9% 13.0% 0.0%    
Substantive and acting employees (by region)
Substantive and acting employees Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
Substantive 626 1,760 558 4,485 1,950 1,487 1,048 1,702 0 13,616 85.1%
Acting 45 156 40 100 138 84 69 117 0 749 4.7%
Not applicable Footnote 2 41 267 35 507 370 9 152 256 0 1,637 10.2%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Active and inactive employees (by region)
Active and inactive employees Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
Active 672 2,056 601 4766 2,308 1,497 1,189 1,933 0 15,022 93.9%
InactiveFootnote 1 40 127 326 100 150 83 80 142 0 980 6.1%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Sex (by region)
Sex Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
Female 321 1,031 252 2,944 1,225 642 571 928 0 7,914 49.5%
Male 391 1,152 381 2,148 1,233 938 698 1,147 0 8,088 50.5%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
First official language (by region)
First official language Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
English 579 459 528 3,468 2,391 1,522 1,209 2,050 0 12,206 76.3%
French 133 1,724 105 1,624 67 58 60 25 0 3,796 23.7%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Bilingual bonus (by region)
Bilingual bonus Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
Yes 251 1,838 193 2,278 186 234 107 52 0 5,139 32.1%
No 420 78 405 2,307 1,902 1,337 1,010 1767 0 9,226 57.7%
Not applicableFootnote 2 41 267 35 507 370 9 152 256 0 1,637 10.2%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Age
Substantive and acting employees (by region)
Age Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
0-19 2 24 4 34 61 0 23 31 0 179 1.1%
20-24 30 217 26 334 287 30 123 241 0 1,288 8.0%
25-29 26 166 37 406 185 109 117 202 0 1,248 7.8%
30-34 76 225 89 490 221 234 169 261 0 1,765 11.0%
35-39 149 381 134 777 401 321 214 362 0 2,739 17.1%
40-44 141 438 110 812 367 238 164 310 0 2,580 16.1%
45-49 105 275 97 728 274 237 152 273 0 2,141 13.4%
50-54 94 233 78 742 254 213 141 203 0 1,958 12.2%
55-59 65 156 45 500 244 145 111 122 0 1,388 8.7%
60-64 21 54 8 207 116 36 44 56 0 542 3.4%
65+ 3 14 5 62 48 17 11 14 0 174 1.1%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Average age 42.5 40.1 41.2 42.4 40.7 42.3 40.0 38.9 0.0 41.1  
Years of service (by region)
Years of service Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
0-4 74 426 78 988 368 290 257 397 0 2,878 18.0%
5-9 86 227 85 467 137 136 173 204 0 1,515 9.5%
10-14 223 557 152 1,217 550 401 277 497 0 3,874 24.2%
15-19 143 379 128 875 412 355 158 336 0 2,786 17.4%
20-24 43 115 46 366 164 103 78 150 0 1,065 6.7%
25-29 66 119 71 407 227 126 102 126 0 1,244 7.8%
30-34 26 74 28 199 162 121 59 72 0 741 4.6%
35+ 10 15 10 57 67 37 12 21 0 229 1.4%
Data not availableFootnote 3 0 4 0 9 1 2 1 16 0 33 0.2%
Not applicableFootnote 2 41 267 35 507 370 9 152 256 0 1,637 10.2%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Average years of service 14.4 12.5 14.9 13.3 15.6 14.7 12.8 13.0 0.0 13.7  
Eligibility to retire without financial penalty (by region)
Eligibility to retire without financial penaltyFootnote 4 Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
2019-20 43 133 37 409 320 153 99 126 0 1,320 18.0%
2020-21 23 41 12 139 76 44 29 35 0 399 9.5%
2021-22 29 39 12 127 45 53 27 34 0 366 24.2%
2022-23 19 32 19 128 50 28 24 37 0 337 17.4%
2023-24 15 33 14 124 44 34 29 37 0 330 6.7%
2024-25+ 542 1,634 504 3,649 1,552 1,257 908 1,534 0 11,580 7.8%
Data not availableFootnote 3 0 4 0 9 1 2 1 16 0 33 0.2%
Not applicableFootnote 2 41 267 35 507 370 9 152 256 0 1,637 10.2%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Eligibility to retire with full pension (by region)
Eligibility to retire with full pensionFootnote 5 Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
2019-20 11 18 14 63 79 42 17 24 0 268 1.7%
2020-21 1 5 2 18 21 7 3 8 0 65 0.4%
2021-22 3 14 1 31 21 22 10 15 0 117 0.7%
2022-23 9 18 5 54 36 46 17 16 0 201 1.3%
2023-24 7 23 11 64 56 24 15 24 0 224 1.4%
2024-25+ 640 1,834 565 4,346 1,874 1,428 1,054 1,716 0 13,457 84.1%
Data not availableFootnote 3 0 4 0 9 1 2 1 16 0 33 0.2%
Not applicableFootnote 2 41 267 35 507 370 9 152 256 0 1,637 10.2%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Occupational group (by region)
Occupational group Atlantic Quebec NOR HQ-NCR GTA SOR Prairie Pacific Missing/Closed CC Total %
AS 10 23 4 865 20 14 9 17 0 962 6.0%
AU 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.1%
CH 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 45 0.3%
CO 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 57 0.4%
CR 39 304 36 356 303 116 143 293 0 1,590 9.9%
CS 1 1 1 634 0 1 1 1 0 640 4.0%
DM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0%
EC 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 179 1.1%
ED-LAT 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 0.1%
EG 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0.1%
EL 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.1%
EN-ENG 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.1%
EX 4 7 4 140 7 8 6 9 0 185 1.2%
FB 609 1,604 554 1,820 1,784 1,418 972 1,524 0 10,285 64.3%
FI 6 12 6 148 8 8 7 6 0 201 1.3%
FS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
GL-ELE 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 11 0.1%
GL-MAN 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.0%
GL-MDO 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0.0%
GS-STS 1 8 0 8 2 1 2 3 0 25 0.2%
GT 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.0%
IS 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 103 0.6%
LS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
MA 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.0%
OM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0%
PC 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.0%
PE 0 0 0 308 0 0 0 0 0 308 1.9%
PG 1 2 3 30 2 3 2 3 0 46 0.3%
PM 13 11 0 96 0 0 18 1 0 139 0.9%
PS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0%
SE-RES 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.0%
SU 28 210 25 198 332 9 109 217 0 1,128 7.0%
Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Total 712 2,183 633 5,092 2,458 1,580 1,269 2,075 0 16,002  
Date modified: