We have archived this page on the web

The information was accurate at the time of publishing but may no longer reflect the current state at the Canada Border Services Agency. It is not subject to the Government of Canada web standards.

Executive Vice-President's Transition Binder 2019
Information, Science and Technology Branch (ISTB)

Mandate and overview

Minh Doan: Vice-President and Chief Information Officer

Minh Doan

Mr. Minh Doan was appointed Vice-President of the Information, Science and Technology Branch (ISTB) and Chief Information Officer on January 2, 2018. Since joining the CBSA in 2014 as the Director General of the Business Applications Services Directorate, Minh has also taken on the role of interim Vice-President of ISTB from September 2016 until September 2017 and Director General of Enterprise Architecture, Information Management and Common Services from September to December 2017.

Minh has over 17 years of private and public sector experience in leading enterprise IT projects, improving the efficiency of IT and aligning IT with business operations.

Before joining the CBSA, Minh was an Executive Director at Employment and Social Development Canada where he led major Business and Technology Transformation Projects. Prior to that he worked at the Privy Council Office (PCO) on Administrative Services Review and government-wide IT strategies to transform service delivery to Canadians. He has also held progressively more senior positions at Service Canada and Bell Canada.

Minh has a bachelor's degree in Computer Science from the Université du Québec and a certificate in Leading Change and Organizational Renewal from the Harvard Business School.

Executive team

Minh Doan
Vice-President and Chief Information Officer

Cameron Macdonald
Director General
Business Application Services Directorate

Patrick Mineault
A/Director General
Business, Corporate Projects and Management Portfolio Directorate

Franco Germano
A/Director General
Commercial Portfolio Directorate

Gino Lechasseur
Director General
Enterprise Architecture, Information Management and Common Services Directorate

Daniel Tremblay
Director General
Enterprise Services Directorate

Dave Thompson
Director General
Science and Engineering Directorate

Kelly Bélanger
Director General
Travellers Projects Portfolio Directorate


Supporting CBSA’s vision

Directorates and core responsibilities

Business Application Services Division (BASD):
Responsible for the development, maintenance and support of IT application solutions related to travellers, enterprise and common services, commercial and corporate.

Business, Corporate Projects and Portfolio Management (BCPPMD):
Responsible for supporting fiscally sound business processes and the achievement of ISTB key initiatives and deliverables through effective and efficient monitoring, reporting and management, including client management, risk management of the portfolio, prioritization and governance and corporate application project management.

Commercial Portfolio Directorate (CPD):
Responsible for delivering IT projects that ensure the safety of Canadians and facilitate commercial trade.

Enterprise Architecture, Information Management and Common Services (EAIMCS):
Responsible for providing the holistic Information Management (IM) and Enterprise Architecture (EA) programs for the Agency. In addition, this Directorate is responsible for supporting the Agency’s Data Analytics program and enabling Business Collaboration. The EA Program also includes the development and maintenance of the CBSA Reference Architecture (CBSA blueprint) used across the Agency.

Enterprise Services Directorate (ESD):
Responsible for the Agency’s IT infrastructure and services supporting the effective delivery of technology products, applications and services to meet business needs, while ensuring the integrity and availability of all technology infrastructure.

Science and Engineering (S&E):
The authority for science and engineering activity within the CBSA, and ensures that the Agency fully and smartly leverages science and technology by keeping abreast of and sharing new developments and best practices, applying a scientific lens to business challenges, and practicing due diligence in the application of science and engineering within a border management context.

Travellers Projects Portfolio Directorate (TPPD):
Responsible for delivering IT projects that ensure the safety of Canadians and facilitate travel.

How technology support is organized

Client services for major IT project management are aligned to the CBSA’s business: Travellers, Commercial, Intelligence and Enforcement, Corporate, and Common Services.

Traditional IM/IT functions:

Science and Engineering functions:

Enterprise Architecture functions:

Supporting all 17 DRF programs and internal services, including business, data/information, applications, technology, security and privacy domains.

Operating environment: Key partners and stakeholders

Major deliverables for fiscal year 2019 to 2020

Information Technology (IT) organization

Deliverable 1: Cloud strategy

Develop Cloud Strategy for the Agency; will support closure of St. Laurent Data Centre by 2023

Deliverable 2: Workload migration

Migration of all CBSA assets and services out of Shared Services Canada’s (SSC’s) Data Centre St. Laurent (DCSL) and Centre des Données Ouest Québec (CDOQ) before March 2023

Deliverable 3: Windows 10 migration

Migration of over 14,000 devices from outdated operating systems to Windows 10 before end of support in January 2020

Deliverable 4: Microsoft server 2016 upgrade

Mandatory operating system upgrades for all Windows servers before end of support in January 2020

Travellers projects

Interactive advance passenger information

Biometrics expansion

Entry/Exit

Primary Inspection Kiosk

Passenger Protect Program centralized screening

NEXUS integration into Primary Inspection Kiosks

Building on the implementation of the Primary Inspection Kiosks, looking to integrate NEXUS into Primary Inspection Kiosks and adding facial biometrics.

Gender designation

Changes to CBSA systems to support implementation of a Government of Canada Policy Framework for gender designation potentially impacting the collection of gender data and introduction of an additional gender marker.

Commercial projects

eManifest

Postal Modernization Initiative

Secure Corridor Concept

Science and Engineering (S&E) projects

Two-way radio modernization

Tailorable Operational Picture System (TOPS) data visualization proof of concept

Voice Reporting System (part of Alternative to Detention Program)

Roberts Bank Marine Container Examination Facility (Vancouver)

Opioids Crisis Initiative

Guns and Gangs Initiative

Other Information, Science and Technology Branch (ISTB) project involvement

Advanced analytics

Geospatial analytics service upgrades

Recourse Content Management System (RCMS): Case management (GCCase) pilot

(PAXIS) Stabilization and optimization: Phase 2

Upcoming / “on the radar” projects: Travellers

Known Travellers Digital Identity (KTDI)

Travellers Entry Processing System replacement

Generic Passage Flow

Refers to the future state of border processing and will address the complete border processing continuum from a traveller perspective.

Reporting Offsite Arrival: Mobile (ROAM)

ROAM will be deployed at small Canadian Ports of Entry.

Customs Processing Center System (CPCS) System replacement

Upcoming / “on the radar” projects: Commercial

Commercial Trusted Trader Program membership service enhancements

Enhance Highway Carrier harmonization of the CBSA Partners in Protection and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Commercial Risk Assessment and Commercial Data Acquisition and Notification service enhancements

Canadian Export Reporting System

Other “on the radar” projects

Dynamic risking

Predictive analytics will be used to assign compliance scores for all travellers entering Canada, which will be relayed to Border Services Officers and support at-border decision making. This will result in fewer and faster interactions with low-risk travellers and direct CBSA activities toward higher-value returns.

Image and network/graph analytics, and data visualization toolset

Trusted digital identity

Significant investment in business and data architecture to ensure data are collected once and reused to ensure higher integrity in the data used to manage the border.

Autonomous and connected vehicles

GC Case

The migration of CBSA Case Management systems to the GC Case platform has begun.

Workforce profile

The following workforce and demographic information is draft information, provided by the Human Resources Branch.

Current workforce
Current workforce
Group Number of employees Percentage
AS 65 6.5%
CH 41 4.1%
CR 41 4.1%
CS 536 53.8%
EC 1 0.1%
EG 15 1.5%
EL 8 0.8%
EN 10 1.0%
EX 22 2.2%
FB 224 22.5%
GT 1 0.1%
MA 5 0.5%
PM 2 0.2%
SE 8 0.8%
SU 18 1.8%
Total 997 100.0%

Quick facts

Source: OLAP Report, March 31, 2019, and Q4 2018-2019 Employment Equity Report, April 1, 2019

Population by tenure

Population by tenure


Years of service

Years of service

Demographic information

Directorate overview by gender


Directorate overview by gender: By quickly looking at the graph, it may seem that there are more women than men in ISTB’s workforce. However, there are more men than women in two (2) of ISTB’s biggest directorates (BASD: 173 men vs 80 women; ESD: 198 men vs 81 women), explaining the minority of women within the entire branch. Women are also underrepresented in ISTB compared to CBSA’s average representation of women.


Age distribution by gender

Age distribution by gender: There is a need to rejuvenate the workforce as approximately 14% of ISTB’s workforce is under 34 years of age. 59% of its workforce is 45 years old and over, meaning that a great percentage of its workforce is likely to retire within the next 10 years.

Employment equity

Employment equity groups

Please note: External factors (for example labour market availability) can also have an impact on hiring decisions in employment equity groups.


Employment Equity
  ISTB CBSA Percentage difference
between ISTB and CBSA
Workforce availability rate
Women 40.2% 46.8% −6.6% 40.9%
Indigenous Peoples 2.8% 3.3% −0.5% 4.1%
Persons with disabilities 3.8% 3.3% +0.5% 5.1%
Visible minorities 18.2% 15.1% +3.1% 11.9%

Source: OLAP Report and CAS Report, March 31, 2019, and Quarter 4 2018 to 2019 Employment Equity Report, April 1, 2019

The Graph above shows the percentage of specific Employment Equity groups employed by the Information, Science and Technology Branch and the Canada Border Services Agency compared to the workforce availability of these groups.

Women: Workforce availability is 40.9%. 40.2% of Information, Science and Technology Branch’s employees are women. 46.8% of Canada Border Services Agency’s employees are women.

Indigenous Peoples: Workforce availability is 4.1%. 2.8% of Information, Science and Technology Branch’s employees are Indigenous Peoples. 3.3% of Canada Border Services Agency’s employees are Indigenous Peoples.

Persons with disabilities: Workforce availability is 5.1%. 3.8% of Information, Science and Technology Branch’s employees are persons with disabilities. 3.3% of Canada Border Services Agency’s employees are persons with disabilities.

Visible minorities: Workforce availability is 11.9%. 18.2% of Information, Science and Technology Branch’s employees are visible minorities. 15.1% of Canada Border Services Agency’s employees are visible minorities.

Employee departure information

Yearly attrition

Yearly attrition
  2014 to 2015 2015 to 2016 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019
Number of departures 56 70 113 100 57
CBSA attrition 5.0% 5.3% 6.1% 5.9% 4.3%
ISTB attrition 4.5% 5.8% 10.0% 8.6% 5.1%
ESD attrition 4.4% 5.7% 8.4% 6.7% 9.1%
BASD attrition 5.5% 4.2% 10.2% 9.6% 3.9%

Source: CAS Report, April 1, 2014 to April 1, 2019

The yearly attrition graph summarizes the total attrition and attrition rate of all of the Canada Border Services Agency, the Information, Science and Technology Branch, and two Information, Science and Technology Branch directorates (Enterprise Services Directorate and Business Application Services Directorate). It provides yearly figures between 2014/2015 to 2018/2019.

2014 to 2015: There were 56 total departures from the Information, Science and Technology Branch. Canada Border Services had an attrition rate of 5%. The Information, Science and Technology Branch had an attrition rate of 4.5%. The Enterprise Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 4.4%. The Business Applications Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 5.5%.

2015 to 2016: There were 70 total departures from the Information, Science and Technology Branch. Canada Border Services had an attrition rate of 5.3%. The Information, Science and Technology Branch had an attrition rate of 5.8%. The Enterprise Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 5.7%. The Business Applications Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 4.2%.

2016 to 2017: There were 113 total departures from the Information, Science and Technology Branch. Canada Border Services had an attrition rate of 6.1%. The Information, Science and Technology Branch had an attrition rate of 10%. The Enterprise Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 8.4%. The Business Applications Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 10.2%.

2017 to 2018: There were 100 total departures from the Information, Science and Technology Branch. Canada Border Services had an attrition rate of 5.9%. The Information, Science and Technology Branch had an attrition rate of 8.6%. The Enterprise Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 6.7%. The Business Applications Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 9.6%.

2018 to 2019: (Please note some departure data has not yet been captured for fiscal year 2018 to 2019). There were 57 total departures from the Information, Science and Technology Branch. Canada Border Services had an attrition rate of 4.3%. The Information, Science and Technology Branch had an attrition rate of 5.1%. The Enterprise Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 9.1%. The Business Applications Services Directorate had an attrition rate of 3.9%.

Retirement overview

23.6% of ISTB’s workforce is eligible to retire within the next 5 years.


Retirement overview
Type of retirement 2018 to 2019 2019 to 2020 2020 to 2021 2021 to 2022 2022 to 2023
Retirement without financial penalty 82 38 39 42 34
Retirement with full pension 9 8 8 8 18

Source: OLAP Report, March 31, 2019

The retirement overview graph summarizes the status of employees eligible to retire in the Information Science and Technology Branch within the next 5 years. Overall, 23.6% of the Information, Science and Technology Branch’s employees will be eligible to retire in the next 5 years.

In 2018 to 2019, 82 employees will be eligible to retire without financial penalty. 9 employees will be eligible to retire with a full pension.

In 2019 to 2020, 38 employees will be eligible to retire without financial penalty. 8 employees will be eligible to retire with a full pension.

In 2020 to 2021, 39 employees will be eligible to retire without financial penalty. 8 employees will be eligible to retire with a full pension.

In 2021 to 2022, 42 employees will be eligible to retire without financial penalty. 9 employees will be eligible to retire with a full pension.

In 2022 to 2023, 34 employees will be eligible to retire without financial penalty. 18 employees will be eligible to retire with a full pension.


Reasons for departure

Reasons for Departure
Reasons for Departure Percentages
OGD transfer 59.6%
Retirement 32.8%
Resignation 6.1%
Other 1.5%

Reasons for Departure: The Reasons for Departure pie chart shows the percentages of reasons for employee departure from the Information, Science & Technology Branch between April 2014 and April 2019.

Date modified: