We have archived this page on the web

The information was accurate at the time of publishing but may no longer reflect the current state at the Canada Border Services Agency. It is not subject to the Government of Canada web standards.

Executive Vice-President's Transition Binder 2019
Travellers Branch (TB)

Travellers Branch resource profile

Travellers Branch - Total A/B-Base
Salary ($) Non-Salary ($) Total ($)
Headquarters (HQ)
10400: Traveller Facilitation & Compliance 16,820,896 4,739,305 21,560,201
10700: Trusted Traveller 779,412 241,279 1,020,691
11000: Building & Equipment (Uniform Program) 1,540,166 8,453,327 9,993,493
30100: Management & Oversight (VPO and Planning) 3,054,924 126,745 3,181,669
10100: Targeting (IAPI) 66,067 59,896 125,963
10500: Commercial - Trade Facilitation & Compliance (CARM)   26,880 26,880
Subtotal Travellers HQ 22,261,465 13,647,432 35,908,897
Regions
10400: Traveller Facilitation & Compliance 420,067,462 18,466,660 438,534,122
10700: Trusted Traveller 18,757,518 1,266,397 20,023,915
Subtotal Travellers Regions 438,824,980 19,733,057 527,768,555
Total Travellers Branch 461,086,445 33,380,489 494,466,934

As per 2019/20 Q1 Financial Situation Report; does not include anticipated funding.

Vice-President biography

Denis Vinette was appointed as Vice-President of the Travellers Branch on .

Prior to his role as Vice-President of Travellers Branch, he was the Associate Vice-President of the Canada Border Services Agency's Operations Branch.

Denis was hired in 1992 as a Customs Inspector in Prescott, Ontario. He became a Customs Superintendent in 1994 in Cornwall and later at Macdonald Cartier International Airport.

He later gained experience in various management positions including those of Director, Border Enforcement; Director General, Strategic Planning and Integration; Director, Personnel Security and Professional Standards; and Regional Director General, Northern Ontario Region. In , Denis assumed the position of Director General, Border Operations Directorate.

Denis graduated from the University of Ottawa and obtained a Bachelor of Social Sciences, with a concentration in Criminology and Psychology.

Vision, mission, core values

Vision

Be a global leader in traveller border services by putting people first and leveraging partnerships and technology to deliver a right-touch traveller experience.

Mission

To enhance border integrity and effectively deliver traveller services by modernizing CBSA traveller facilitation and compliance.

Travellers branch priorities 2019–2020

Our overarching priority remains our capability to successfully support and respond to the operational demands of providing 24/7 services to over 90 million travellers annually.

Functional Management Implementation

Stabilize the Organization

Guidance and Support

Modernize and Streamline

Legislative and Regulatory Work

Develop/ Deploy new technology

Risks, improvement activities and key milestones

Functional Management Model (FMM) Adoption

Adaptability of our workforce to the new Functional Management Model.

Improvement Activity:

Milestones / Expected Completion Date:

Infrastructure

Existing fixed infrastructure, as well as the availability of efficient processing alternatives, may prevent the NEXUS program from fully meeting travellers’ expectations.

Improvement Activity:

Milestones / Expected Completion Date:

NEXUS Program - Sustainability

High maintenance costs, [redacted] may lead to the unsustainability of the NEXUS program.

Improvement Activity:

Milestones / Expected Completion Date: [redacted]

NEXUS Program Awareness

Continuing with the current level of support and promotion of the NEXUS program may lead to diminishing growth in membership.

Improvement Activity:

Milestones / Expected Completion Date: Potential promotional opportunities are under examination.

Traveller Volume Management

The Agency may become further challenged in managing increasing traveller volumes within acceptable service standards.

Improvement Activity:

Milestones / Expected Completion Date:

Staffing plan

The Travellers Branch (HQ) has 48 planned staffing actions at Quarter 1, totalling $2 million.

Approximately 32% of planned staffing actions are associated to and funded by projects.

Staffing plan allocation
Planned Staffing (Group and Level) Number Planned Spending ($)
FB 20 976,000
EC 5 202,000
AS/CR/PM 14 473,000
Students 5 91,000
EX 4 281,000
Total 48 2,000,000

2019–2020 Procurement Priorities

As of Quarter 1, Travellers Branch (HQ) is forecasting a $12 million requirement for procurement priorities.

Travellers Branch is currently reviewing branch procurement in conjunction with FCMB.

2019–2020 Procurement Priorities
Description Amount ($)
Uniform Program (Logistik and Pacific Safety Products) 7,700,000
Traveller Processing Modernization, Entry-Exit, etc (Consultants) [redacted]
NAV Canada Memorandum of Understanding (Airline Compliance) 750,000
Printing and Scanning of E311 Declaration Cards 553,000
Other 169,000
Total [redacted]

Efficiency planning

Establishment of organization structures.

Opportunity for the three Branches to identify key files / key responsibilities.

Participation in the Efficiency and Modernization Committee (under discussion)

Dynamic Risking

Future efficiency, pending outcome of proof of concept.

Annex

Annex A: Travel and Hospitality

Travellers Branch HQ is planning $515,000 of travel and hospitality expenditures.

ISTB transfer not included

Integrated Risk and Performance Report

Overview

The Traveller Programs Directorate’s (TPD’s) Q1/Q2 Fiscal Year 2018–19 Integrated Risk and Performance Report consists of the following components:

DRF KPI

Program Internal KPI

Client Perspective

Operational Issues/Risks

Overall Performance: Departmental Results Framework

This following table depicts the status of the Departmental Results Framework key performance indicators (KPIs) for the first 2 quarters of fiscal year 2017 to 2018 compared to fiscal year 2018 to 2019.

Departmental Results Framework
Program Departmental Result Performance Indicator Annual Target 2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Performance status
Traveller Facilitation and Compliance (TFC) Admissible travellers are processed in an efficient manner Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the Highway Border Wait Times (BWT) Service Standard 95% 97.6% 94.8% Decline
Travellers and their goods are compliant with applicable legislation Immigration: Percentage of traveller examinations that produced a result (enforcement or facilitation action) 31% 27.3% Decline
Customs: Percentage of traveller goods examinations that produced a result (enforcement or facilitation action) 23% 16.8% TBD TBD
Trusted Traveller Trusted Traveller and Trader programs increase processing efficiency of low-risk, pre-approved travellers and trade partners Ratio of Trusted Travellers referred for examination compared to that of conventional travellers 1:5 1:4 1:10 Improvement
Percentage of Trusted Travellers in compliance with legislation and program regulations 95% 99.97% 99.97% Stable
New Key Performance Indicators to be included in the DRF in 2019-20
TFC Admissible travellers are processed in an efficient manner Percentage of traveller using Primary Inspection Kiosk (PIK) at PIK-ready airports 95% 87.1% 92.6% Improvement
Percentage of time Primary Inspection Kiosk Application is available to travellers 99.5% -- 100% Stable
Long description

Key findings:

In general, traveller programs saw stable/improved performance in Q1/Q2 2018/19 from the same period last fiscal.

The Highway BWT performance reporting methodology change introduced in Q4 last fiscal resulted in a decrease in performance results at several Highway POEs in Q1 this fiscal. In Q2, however, with the service standard adjusted from 10 to 20 minutes for weekdays in July and August, POEs generally saw improved performance results. Nationally, the BWT service standard was met 94.8% of the time in Q1/Q2. Without this adjustment, the result for Q1/Q2 would have been 93.9%.

The Immigration and Customs Examination KPI results are not yet available due to delayed release of the web-based Operational Reporting Application (ORA). Data quality analysis of ORA is currently being conducted by the Performance Reporting Unit in the new Strategic Branch. ORA is expected to address many of the challenges with the old system, and provide the Agency with a unique data governance opportunity to improve the timeliness, consistency, and completeness of Agency data.

The conventional/trusted traveller selective referral rate ratio KPI was refined for 2018-19 to reflect only Air mode traveller selective referrals, as IPIL Highway does not have the system capability to report referrals by referral type.

To fulfill the Agency’s commitment to report on the performance of external digital services, the following two KPIs are currently being tested and will be included in the DRF 2019-20 reporting cycle:

  1. Traveller usage of Primary Inspection Kiosk (PIK) at PIK-ready airports achieved 92.6% in Q1/Q2 2018-19, increasing from 87.1% in Q1/Q2 2017-18. Two additional airports brought PIK online in Q1 2018-19: Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport and Winnipeg Richardson Airport. A target of 95% is proposed
  2. The percentage of time the PIK Application is available to travellers is a new KPI that underwent testing by the IT Service Management Team. It captures full outages associated with CBSA service delivery. A full outage means all PIK sites across Canada were out of service. Outages caused by our service delivery partners (e.g., Shared Services, Port Authorities, Vendor) are not included in the calculation. A target of 99.5% is proposed

Overall Performance: Internal Key Performance Indicators

This table includes a graphically depiction of the status of the Departmental Results Framework key performance indicators (KPIs) for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2017-18 compared to fiscal year 2018-19.

Traveller Programs Internal Key Performance Indicators
Annual target 2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Performance status
NEXUS Program Summary
Awareness of the Trusted Traveller Program by potential members via views of the NEXUS application Web page 800,000 420,131 339,929 Decline
NEXUS usage in all modes (passage rate) 9.5% 9.5% 9.7% Improvement
Percentage of NEXUS members examined who are found to be in compliance with border legislation, regulations and program criteria 97% 99.97% 99.97% Stable
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the NEXUS Program Application Service Standard 95% 70.8% 67.25% Decline
Percentage of NEXUS members renewing membership 50% 59.6% 66.2% Improvement
Percentage of NEXUS membership cancellations –shown as yearly cumulative result 0.02% 0.04% 0.03% Decline
Traveller Program Service Standards
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the Air BWT Service
Standard – Internal only
95% 99.4% 99.1% Decline
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the CANPASS Programs Applications Service Standard 95% 95.8% 100% Improvement
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the CDRP Application Service Standard 95% 100% 100% Improvement
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the FAST Program Application Service Standard 95% 100% 100% Improvement
Percentage of time the CBSA is meeting the NEXUS Highway BWT Service Standard 95% -- 96.4% Stable
Long description

NEXUS annual program summary

According to Google Analytics, the CBSA NEXUS application Web page views decreased in the first half of this fiscal (340K) from the same period last fiscal (420K). The United States Customs and Border Protection launched a new online Trusted Traveller portal in late 2017, which has likely led potential and existing NEXUS members to use the new portal instead of the CBSA application Web page.

Uptake of the NEXUS Program continues to grow in Q1/Q2 FY2018-19. Overall, the NEXUS share of all air and highway traveller passages is 9.7%, up from 9.5% in the same period last year. While the total air and highway traveller volume increased by 2.7% in FY2018-19 Q1/Q2, NEXUS volume increased by 5.5%.

The NEXUS program application service standard dipped considerably in 2017-18. This trend has continued into Q1/Q2 this fiscal, as the Niagara Falls/Windsor Risk Assessment Units had challenges in addressing application backlog due to staffing constraints.

Despite a decrease in the NEXUS membership cancellation volume in Q1/Q2 this fiscal (from 686 in Q1/Q2 FY 2017-18 to 453), the NEXUS membership cancellation rate (0.03%) is already above the annual target rate of 0.02%. Cancellations occur as a result of customs or immigration enforcement actions, issues of criminality, or violations of the NEXUS Program’s membership conditions. The statistics show that approximately 75% of cancellations result from a customs enforcement action. Examining historical trends, cancellation volumes vary considerably year to year. The target rate of this KPI is being re-evaluated.

Traveller Program Service Standards

Airports exhibit exceptional performance in BWTs despite increases in traveller volumes. However, issues were identified during the working group meetings, raising questions about the integrity of the results. (see slide 6 for more information).

Trusted Traveller Programs’ Application Service Standards continue to present stable results. As of April 3, 2018, CANPASS Air and CANPASS Private Boats are no longer accepting applications. The service standard now reflects the processing of CANPASS Corporate Aircraft and Private Aircraft applications only.

The NEXUS Highway BWT Service Standard was introduced in October this year and is applicable to five POEs (Douglas, Pacific Highway in Pacific Region, and Peace Bridge, Whirlpool Bridge, and Queenston-Lewiston Bridge in Southern Ontario Region). TPD is currently examining the feasibility of expanding this service standard to two additional POEs (Aldergrove and Abbotsford-Huntingdon).

Client Perspective: Recourse – Q1 and Q2 – Travellers – National

Enforcement Appeals
2016-17
Q1 and Q2
2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Volumes
Enforcement Actions (K19s) 6,986 7,878 8,509
Appeals Opened 661 601 687
Appeal Rate 9% 8% 8%
Outcomes
Total Decisions Issued 543 517 518
Percentage Upheld 71% 65% 61%
Percentage Amended 18% 20% 17%
Percentage Overturned 11% 15% 22%
Enhanced Complaint Mechanism
2016-17
Q1 and Q2
2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Percentage of First Contacts within 14 days 85% 87% 85% 89% 85% 73%
Percentage of Final Responses within 40 days 85% 98% 85% 98% 85% 93%
Volumes
Number of Compliments received 184 157 193
Number of Comments received 96 155 103
Number of Complaints received 1,265 903 1,037
Total Feedback received 1,545 1,215 1,333
Traveller to Complaint ratio 44,647 : 1 59,281 : 1 50,567 : 1
Outcomes
Number of Complaints closed 1,038 906 1044
Percentage of Complaints founded 20% 18% 20%
Enforcement Litigation
2016-17
Q1 and Q2
2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Enforcement Appeals before the Courts (Provincial and Federal)
Intakes 14 10 10
Closures 18 11 12
Percentage of Positive Outcomes 67% 82% 75%
Canadian Agricultural Review Tribunal
Intakes 17 15 7
Closures 13 4 8
Percentage of Positive Outcomes 75% 25% 75%
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Intakes 1 4 4
Closures 1 0 2
Percentage of Positive Outcomes 100% N/A 100%

No Activity from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to report

Appeal Overturn rates - National

Top three overturned reasons:

Founded Complaints - National

Top three founded complaint types:

Sources: RCMS Enforcement 2018-10-30, ICES 2018-11-01, ECM CCCDB 2018-10-31

Operational Issue/Risk

Operational Issue/Risk #1: Growing Air Traveller Volume and the PIK Operational Model Increased Need for BWT Monitoring

Risk Description: Work in progress

Increased traveller volumes adding pressure to POE resources in order to meet internal BWT service standard.

Operation changes resulting from PIK put BWT measuring and reporting at risk.

Findings

The need for reliable BWT data collection in the air mode is captured in a number of CBSA commitments. CBSA’s Service Management Strategy requires a published service standard for air traveller processing. The TPD is committed to examining BWT pressure in the air mode as a result of the recent PIK Evaluation management action plan. Additionally, the policy framework of Bill C-49 (the Transportation Modernization Act) introduces the authority for the Minister of Transport to collect BWT data from the CBSA.

Presently, measuring and reporting Air BWT poses a significant challenge for CBSA staff, due to the introduction of PIK and the lack of a standard BWT measuring and reporting procedure.

PIA T3 has stopped reporting BWT delay incidents (>20mins) this fiscal, as the Bluetooth technology originally used to report BWTs no longer produces reliable results due to kiosk layout (i.e., 11 kiosks in Node C, 10 kiosks in B, and 83 in Customs Hall). At the same time, traveller volume increased 15.9% at this POE in Q1/Q2 from the same period last fiscal, putting BWT at risk.

Vancouver’s BWT Q1/Q2 result (94.1%) is below the annual target. Traveller volumes increased by 18.3% in Q1/Q2 when compared to the same period in FY2016-17, adding resource pressure to the POE. The POE received 5 traveller BWT complaints in Q1/Q2.

Montreal has the largest increase in traveller volume (20.7%) over a 2-year period. While the POE did not report any delay incidents in Q1/Q2, it received 10 traveller BWT complaints, raising questions about the integrity of the BWT reporting.

Large airport delays and wait times complaints
2016-17
Q1 and Q2
2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Trend
Pearson T1 3 3 6 Up
Montreal 16 6 10 Up
Vancouver 15 6 5 Down
Pearson T3 3 10 11 Up
Calgary 8 5 3 Down
Border wait times performance
2016-17
Q1 and Q2
2017-18
Q1 and Q2
2018-19
Q1 and Q2
Pearson T1 98.5% 99.4% 99.9%
Montreal 99.2% 99.9% 100.0%
Vancouver 95.9% 97.1% 94.1%
Pearson T3 97% 99.7% 100%
Calgary 99.2% 99.4% 98.4%

Air traveller volume - Large airports

Long description

This column graph illustrates the trend in air traveller volumes for five large airports for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2016-17 to fiscal year 2018-19. Traveller volumes are presented along the vertical axis, from 0 to 6,000,000. Five airports are listed along the horizontal axis with separate columns for combined Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 data in fiscal year 2016-17, fiscal year 2017-18, and fiscal year 2018-19.

For each airport, traveller volume increased year over year.

  • For Pearson International Airport Terminal One, total air traveller volume for Q1 and Q2 were 4,480,406 in 2016-17, 4,851,576 in 2017-18 and 4,791,233 in 2018-19. Over the period, air traveller volume increased by 6.9%
  • For Vancouver Airport, total air traveller volume for Q1 and Q2 were 3,230,626 in 2016-17, 3,652,474 in 2017-18 and 3,821,286 in 2018-19. Over the period, air traveller volume increased by 18.3%
  • For Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, total air traveller volume for Q1 and Q2 were 2,902,402 in 2016-17, 3,250,930 in 2017-18 and 3,502,726 in 2018-19. Over the period, air traveller volume increased by 20.7%
  • For Pearson International Airport Terminal Three, total air traveller volume for Q1 and Q2 were 3,019,783 in 2016-17, 3,291,877 in 2017-18 and 3,499,122 in 2018-19. Over the period, air traveller volume increased by 15.9%
  • For Calgary Airport, total air traveller volume for Q1 and Q2 were 1,251,206 in 2016-17, 1,328,376 in 2017-18 and 1,368,677 in 2018-19. Over the period, air traveller volume increased by 9.4%

Consideration / Discussion

Operational Issue/Risk #2: Increased Immigration Facilitation Volume Adding Pressure on CBSA Frontline Resource

Risk Description: High risk

Increased foreign national volumes, combined with increased immigration facilitation activities put enforcement performance at risk.

Findings

Traveller Air Program experienced the most significant increase in resource pressure over the last 5 years. While the program has maintained its performance targets with a relatively flat budget, this has been sustained largely by process improvements (e.g., from PIL to PIK), and resource prioritization within the program (e.g., from Secondary to Primary, from enforcement activities to facilitation activities).

In particular, at the top 11 air ports of entry (POEs), immigration facilitation activitiesFootnote 1 increased 27.4% in 2 years. While volume growth is observed in all facilitation activities, asylum claims and study permits saw the largest increase (153.7% and 45.2% respectively).

A Resource Allocation Model (RAM)-based costing analysis shows that the Agency spent nearly $18 million on immigration facilitation activities in FY2016-17 at the top 11 air POEs, the highest among all secondary functions and nearly 15% of the total traveller operating budget. Given the increase in immigration facilitation volume, an even bigger share of the operating budget is expected for this fiscal.

Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada implemented the Global Skills Strategy last year, and launched the Student Direct Stream in June this year to facilitate study permit applications from China, India, the Philippines and Vietnam. These initiatives, while beneficial to Canadian Economy, will continue putting pressure on CBSA’s frontline operation, as POE issuance of work/study permits remains a resource intensive administrative process.

Immigration facilitation growth: Top 11 Ports of Entry Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 - 3-year

Long description

This column graph illustrates the trend in immigration facilitation growth at the top 11 air ports of entry for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2016-17 to fiscal year 2018-19. Volumes of results are presented along the vertical axis, from 0 to 450,000. Fiscal year 2016-17, fiscal year 2017-18, and fiscal year 2018-19 are listed along the horizontal axis with data for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 combined. For each year, a stacked column is presented with volumes for Work Permits, Study Permits, Visitor Records, Permanent Resident Landings and Refugee Claims.

Total facilitation results increased year over year, with an overall increase of 27.4% from fiscal year 2016-17 to fiscal year 2018-19.

  • For fiscal year 2016-17, there were 43,836 Work Permits, 83,842 Study Permits, 8,928 Visitor Records, 49,809 Permanent Resident Landings, and 782 Refugee Claims
  • For fiscal year 2017-18, there were 53,312 Work Permits, 98,208 Study Permits, 10,315 Visitor Records, 44,731 Permanent Resident Landings, and 973 Refugee Claims
  • For fiscal year 2018-19, there were 62,635 Work Permits, 112,123 Study Permits, 11,953 Visitor Records, 50,729 Permanent Resident Landings, and 1,747 Refugee Claims

Fiscal year 2016-17 costing allocation: Top 11 Air ports of entrys (in millions)

Long description

This pie chart illustrates the costing allocation in millions of dollars for various activities at the top 11 air ports of entry for fiscal year 2016-17.

  • For Primary Inspection Line, (IPIL and ABC), $58.7 million for 47.9% of the total
  • For Detector Dog Services, $2.7 million for 2.2% of the total
  • For Immigration Facilitation, $18.0 million for 14.7% of the total
  • For Immigration Enforcement, $10.4 million for 8.5% of the total
  • For Customs and OGD Facilitation, $12.5 million for 10.2% of the total
  • For Customs and OGD Enforcement, $7.1 million for 5.8% of the total
  • For Point, $10.1 million for 8.2% of the total
  • For Other, $3.1 million for 2.5% of the total

Consideration / Discussion

Are there ways to reduce the impact of immigration facilitation volume as cost factor through process improvements, automation, and OGD collaboration?

Operational Issue/Risk #3: Roving Data Reporting Issues Preventing Performance Evaluation

Risk Description: Work in progress

BSO time spent on roving is not always reported using roving activity type; roving referrals and results are not entered in ICS-Secondary Processing (SP) and ICES as required, preventing performance analysis of roving function.

Findings

The roving function provides a valuable risk-mitigation process to the Primary Inspection Kiosk operation model. To enable integrated roving performance reporting, the TPD, working jointly with Traveller Operations, developed a detailed Closing the Loop reporting procedure and created a new roving activity type in March 2018.

The first quarterly (Q1) roving performance report released in July highlighted various data entry issues/gaps. Over the course of Q2, the TPD, Traveller Operations, and regions worked diligently through PIK regional working group sessions to resolve these issues.

While all POEs reported rover referrals (chart below) in Q2, data entry improvements are required in the following areas:

Quarter 1/Quarter 2
Roving PIK-ready POEs
Rover Referrals Enforcement Results Resultant Rate Activity Report (hrs) Number of BSO hrs per Referral
[redacted] 3,306 368 11.1% 2,283.1 0.69
[redacted]       10,791.0 N/A
[redacted] 975 391 40.1% 12,009.8 12.32
[redacted] 550 85 15.5% 5,155.2 9.37
[redacted] 389 23 5.9% 87.0 0.22
[redacted] 519 27 5.2% 9.0 0.02
[redacted] 576 52 9.0% 2,501.5 4.34
[redacted] 27 3 11.1% 915.0 33.89
[redacted] 12 1 8.3% - 0.00
[redacted] 46 2 4.3% 1,405.0 30.54

Quarter 1 and quarter 2 rover referrals and customs/OGD enforcement resultant rate

Long description

This combined line and column graph illustrates the volume of rover referrals and the roving enforcement resultant rate for nine airports for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2018-19. Volumes are presented along the primary vertical axis from 0 to 2,500. Percentages are presented along the secondary vertical axis from 0% to 60%. Nine airports are listed along the horizontal axis with separate columns for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 rover referral data, and two points along the line graph for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 roving enforcement resultant rates.

  • For [redacted], there were 1386 rover referrals in Q1 and 1920 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 10.7% in Q1 and 11.5% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 391 rover referrals in Q1 and 584 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 51.7% in Q1 and 32.4% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 188 rover referrals in Q1 and 362 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 13.3% in Q1 and 16.6% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 173 rover referrals in Q1 and 216 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 6.4% in Q1 and 5.6% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 266 rover referrals in Q1 and 253 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 5.3% in Q1 and 5.1% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 300 rover referrals in Q1 and 276 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 6.7% in Q1 and 11.6% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 9 rover referrals in Q1 and 18 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 11.1% in Q1 and 11.1% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 3 rover referrals in Q1 and 9 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 0.0% in Q1 and 11.1% in Q2
  • For [redacted], there were 44 rover referrals in Q1 and 2 rover referrals in Q2; the roving enforcement resultant rate was 4.5% in Q1 and 0.0% in Q2

Consideration and next steps:

Date modified: